Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:55, 26 August 2009

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Template:Michael Kapoustin bio

Full Protection I am the person in question, and have lived the events, there is an Edit war, facts are being removed and being replaced with libelous nonsense, alleged vol. editors are selective and in cases fabricating their own versions of history. There is high probability due controversies and litigation in courts against Bulgaria and RCMP that attempts will be made to edit out truth and edit in libelous misrepresentations. The bio started from a 3rd part user developing the historic content. First version was deleted by unknown editors within hours of posting. Most unusual. Pls see "talk" page on this. Warning of my taking possible legal action for edits being made is not idle threat. As the subject of the bio I have legal right to ensure truthfulness and accuracy of edits. Immediate action must be taken by wiki to end vandalism, malicious edits, libels. I request that original contributor be allowed to continue his work and certain materials. The ORIGINAL FIRST post should be reinstated. The creator allowed access. I as the subject will edit out inaccuracies and will provide an online source for verifiable facts/documents, serious news reports, court records, etc.., witness testimony. If others have reputable sources with alleging contravening "facts", these should be identified on the discussion board and I agree should be included IF the source is reputable and can be considered reasonably neutral. I do not wish the bio to be self serving and I am sure the originator of it also did not. However, I had spent 13 years and several months defending my character and challenging, successfully in the courts, anyone who desires to perpetuate the myth created by the RCMP and Bulgarian yellow press over the course of more than a decade. Clearly, those responsible should not hide behind the anonymity of on online "handles and Wiki cannot shield itself with a defense of having no control over the content appearing on its platform. Therefore, in fairness to the truth of my life and the events that surround my existence all to editors concerned with the truth and not simply their "power" to alter the work of others I propose "Full Protection" with access going to the (1) originator, (2) myself and (3) an editor with a name, address and telephone number whose concerns are telling life story accurately, both sides, good and bad and (4) that there is an immediate restoration of the first version posted to wikii, and if there is so much interest in verifiability of my life, then a healthy debate may ensue in the discussion section. All I can say now about the editing is that what it has devolved to is pure historic nonsense. As can be seen by the inaccurate references to the PM of Bulgara in 2007, where I spent my time of captivity and why. Most disturbing is that this was posted AFTER I corrected the edit. Ergo, the last editors true objective is libel and not verifiability. ANd if unintentional then that last edit was a demonstration of exception incompetence to the point of appearing malicious. Thank youM.Kapoustin MKapoustin (talk) 06:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Greek mythology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, daily vandalism since the 21st. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 06:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ted Kennedy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, Kennedy has died, so this page is gonna get a lot of traffic and edits. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 05:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

• Semi-protected by Dravecky. miranda 05:57, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection spambot target, Repeated vandalism by various IPs and users.    GameShowKid – talk – evidence   04:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

• Semi-protected 3 hours - semi is enough. –xeno 04:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
  • That's not a spambot. It's just someone having linked to a revision and telling friends to press save as much as possible.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Ricardo Asch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protect for a short period, IPs and new user inserting spam. Risker (talk) 03:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No need yet. Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 05:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Geography of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi protection vandalism, multiple ip (and new user) vandalism in very quick succession. Jamesofur (talk) 01:21, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mr.Z-man 01:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Philosophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Persistent vandalism as I speak on the page. Adding of pornographic literature. MuZemike 01:02, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined two instances of vandalism in an hour is not persistent vandalism and does not warrant protection.·Maunus·ƛ· 01:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Big Brother 11 (U.S.) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Once the block lifted, there were numerous childish edits. Although there were some good edits, it is hard to keep track of them as this is a current hit show. The show ends the 15th, so I think the 22nd is a good ending in order for the article to be cleaned up sans vandalism. –túrian 23:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I do see what you're driving at, but I don't think the ip edits are disruptive enough for protection at this moment. I'm not taking bets about the future, though. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 02:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

WWE Breaking Point (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Upcoming event dealing with hardcore ip vandals. Richard (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 02:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Glenn Martin, DDS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, User 71.31.61.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) is posting nonsense. It's being hit by other anonymous vandals. It's supposed to be a kid's show and it's new so it's catching this kind of stuff.Americasroof (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

P.S. I hope this applies to talk page also. The vandal is posting nonsense there also. Americasroof (talk) 20:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I thought I saw you also semi-protected the talk page too. But the vandal is continuing to post there. Thanks again. Americasroof (talk) 00:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Arthur Kemp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, Edit War. Escape Orbit 20:29, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected by Rd232 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Xymmax _{So let it be done} 02:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Boys Over Flowers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protected due to an edit war involving four editors. One of the editors has responded to a request, commenting once, but ze has ignored further requests for involvement, continuing to edit elsewhere. Another editor has ignored multiple requests for involvement altogether, while editing elsewhere. The two remaining editors have formed a consensus. Please unprotect the page. Whatever404 (talk) 20:13, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected I would prefer to give it a couple of more days just to make sure that the other two editors really have dropped out of the discussion. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:48, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Jimmy Robbins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Protected for unknown reasons. The artist has an album coming out September 8th, 2009, he has hosted Radio Disney's top 30 countdown, will have a 2 hour takeover on Radio Disney on August 26th, 2009. Additionally, he has appeared in Seventeen Magazine in the June 2009 issue, Seventeen.com, and The Daily Buzz - a nationally syndicated morning talk show in the CW network. Furthermore, he is listed as notable artists on the Universal Record and Universal Motown wiki pages. We do not know why his notability and achievements have yet to impress an admin. It certainly has been established with the radio play, TV, print, and online presence Please unprotect the page.Adamlarue (talk) 22:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected Dravecky (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) only protected the article from creation through the 28th. Please either ask him, or better yet, ensure that you have an article ready - perhaps one you write in your user space - that shows notability so that it won't get deleted again. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 03:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Carly Fiorina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Edit to remove wp:blp violation. Just prior to full protection, contentious, poorly sourced opinion was reinserted by an editor following the expiry of his 48h block for retaliatory edits to and edit warring on the article. Please see Talk:Carly Fiorina#editprotected for the content that needs to be removed unless and until it can be proven as notable and reliably sourced. Thanks! user:J aka justen (talk) 21:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Done Tan | 39 15:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Fulfilled/denied requests

Ryan Jenkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection He was found and he might have killed his wife. As you expect this is being badly vandalized by ips. Richard (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Maunus ·Maunus·ƛ· 00:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

User:CobraGeek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full-protection vandalism by sock puppets of banned user User:ViperNerd. Was recently semi-protected, but now socks are working around autoconfirmed status to continue harassment on user page. MuZemike 23:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Question: Have you talked to CobraGeek about it? This will mean that he can't edit his own user page. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Gordon Ramsay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Vulnerable to BLP issues; had been semi-protected before. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 22:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 23:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

David Litman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection An WP:SPA account (Wikiwiki1228 (talk · contribs)) with no other edits than to David Litman, insists on changing this redirect to an Unsourced BLP in violation of WP:BLP. This has been going on since 10th of August. I would protect the page myself, however I and a few others have been involved in reverting it back to the appropriate redirect. thanks--Hu12 (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Cirt (talk) 23:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

The Devil Wears Prada (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, The article is still being vandalized after already being protected for a week - there's much vandalism -- lots of varied things and hidden comments stating not to write things are being ignored. GunMetal Angel 21:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Cirt (talk) 22:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Match Attax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection, Recreated after an AfD where salting was mentioned and recreated and speedied five times before that. ThemFromSpace 20:37, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Creation protected — Kralizec! (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

The X Factor (UK series 6) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection for 3 months. For those unaware, this is Britian's answer to American Idol and the level of interest is huge. The programme runs until the week before Christmas, but I think that a request for 4 months is probably pushing it. Just today we've had 5 counts of addition of speculation and point of view from IPs. DJ 19:42, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Why has this been protected for just 2 weeks, whereas Roblox has been protected for 3 months? DJ 20:16, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Because this is the eighth time Roblox has needed to be protected, while only the second for The X Factor? — Kralizec! (talk) 20:22, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

NASA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

GA, semi-protected July 2008 because of persistent but low-level IP vandalism. No serious issues in recent edits. Protecting Admin (Gonzo fan2007) is no longer around to ask to unprotect it. --tlesher (talk) 15:33, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected — Kralizec! (talk) 20:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Aspartame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection, User 66.231.198.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) has stated his intention to work through a computer lab's worth of IP addresses until we let his revision stand. King Öomie 19:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Finlay McWalter for three days. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Van Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Glenn Beck just ran a harsh bio piece on him and all of sudden there has been a massive wave of vandalism against the page from unregistered users.--The lorax (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 36 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Kralizec! (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Roblox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Hey. Temporary protection just expired and vandalism begins once again. Gordonrox24 |  17:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- tariqabjotu 18:39, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Coosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute, rfc and consensus was made and completed ooa 16 july, however {{discussion top}} tags were not placed. move war has begun again without proper due process. emerson7 17:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- tariqabjotu 18:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

User:CobraGeek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Requesting indefinite semi-protection due to userspace vandalism by sock of User:ViperNerd. User Talk:CobraGeek was recently protected so vandalism has moved to my user page. Cheers!. CobraGeek 16:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 17:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I Am… Sasha Fierce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, ip's randomly changing information without sources and ignoring being told not to. Mister sparky (talk) 16:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 17:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Chiranjeevi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection. This page is persistently edited by POV-pushing fans of his, and I have fixed this article up at least three times so far. They add statements like "fondly called 'mega star' by his millions of fans" in the lead paragraph, "his films rarely flop", "he's a family man", "this film was a super hit", so on, so on... despite my several comments on the talk page which warn them not to add peacock or POV statements or unsourced statements at all to a BLP. I can guarantee that if you semi-protect this article temporarily, it will return to the state it was before I cleaned it within a week after the protection lifts. Please protect it indefinitely. GSMR (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

• I would like to endorse the above - attempting to forge a decent article here is a nightmare.  pablo_hablo. 15:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thanks for your concerns, but the last 50 edits range to August 2; basically, there are two edits a day. That's still controllable by reversion and copyediting. If vandalism worsens, feel free to re-report. Cheers, Master of Puppets - _{Call me MoP! :D} 17:07, 25 August 2009 (UTC)