| Revision as of 21:12, 19 August 2009 editBigDunc (talk | contribs)Rollbackers16,576 edits →Note from blocking admin: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:38, 19 August 2009 edit undoNJA (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators30,514 edits →August 2009: adding recent caseNext edit → | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| * See the notes regarding this editor and their attitude towards admins . | * See the notes regarding this editor and their attitude towards admins . | ||
| *Also note a propensity by this user to claim admin abuse when there is in fact none, (see the misuse of tools section in history.) ]<sup>]</sup> 19:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | *Also note a propensity by this user to claim admin abuse when there is in fact none, (see the misuse of tools section in history.) ]<sup>]</sup> 19:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :*Further, note the user has ran a recent 'admin abuse' campaign against me on the talk page at ]. He was warned against last week and yesterday about sidetracking the dispute resolution process and to file a complaint against me if he truly believes his claims ( and ). He was also warned yesterday about refactoring others' talk page comments and calling people trolls. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Note from blocking admin== | ==Note from blocking admin== | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 19 August 2009
- Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.
-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!
|
 Archives |
|---|
Useful links
Irish Manual of Style~
Policy ~
Assume good faith ~
Citing sources ~
Civility ~
Consensus ~
Dispute resolution ~
Etiquette ~
No original research ~
What Misplaced Pages is not ~
No personal attacks ~
Neutral point of view ~
POINT ~
Reliable sources ~
Verifiability ~
WP:Attribution ~
WP:Synthesis ~
WP:Avoid peacock terms ~ Misplaced Pages:Avoid weasel terms
Useful Noticeboard
3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Misplaced Pages:No original research/noticeboard
Template messages
Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes
Your edit
Regarding this edit, the report was closed for being in the wrong forum, and also because admin action isn't needed. He's right, admin action isn't needed because it's up to you lot to sort out the content dispute yourselves. And yes, as I said on my final post on the talk page, if consensus isn't reached then something long term is inevitable. The page could have been unprotected already if a compromised wording had materialised. Anyhow I'm no longer interested in trying to mediate this tedious dispute, thus I've passed my comments on to other admins to keep and eye and to take appropriate action should the situation not change. Of course you are free to contact any admin once consensus between all parties has been reached so that things can move on, though I will no longer be actively watching this battle of wills. Cheers, Nja 09:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- I can be the most reasonable of editors you could meet that is until I come up against BS. We remove misleading information, and replace it with correctly sourced and referenced text. Simple! If there is a dispute, we remove clearly misleading information, discuss the changes necessary and replace. Simple! We don’t leave misleading information in an article until we come up with information to replace it. Simple! Please don’t make a drama out of this, and don’t take my comments personal because they are not meant to be. --Domer48'fenian' 09:28, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Elaborate or cease
If you wish to make a complaint at WP:ADMINABUSE, please do so. If not, cease your accusations as unsubstantiated personal attacks are not welcome. Toddst1 (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- The power abusing admin kept posting after O Fenian kept removing them, O Fenian makes it clear he regrards his posting as harassment, you give him a BS warning, he ignores it, and you block him! Load of bollox! You may not regard it as harassment, but O Fenian did. Now I'll back up my accusations, and I suggest you lose the tone with me. Your block is BS, that's my opinion and one I'm allowed to express! Now that Admin has made accusations about me, and I'm sure you are going to insist they back them up when I ask them to? --Domer48'fenian' 19:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Toddst1 (talk) 19:15, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Go away out of that, this is pure abuse! --Domer48'fenian' 19:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Domer48 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Asking legitimate questions about what I regard as a poor block, and the admin in question blocks me. And Admin’s should not respond to questions about their admin actions by blocking the person asking the questions. Repurposing/reposting others' talk page comments on different pages" does not merit an immediate one month block without warning under any circumstances. Especially when I’m trying to keep the conversation in one place.
Decline reason:
Your abuseive treatment of admins is well documented per nja's comments below, this latest streak of comments at O Fenian's page seems to represent yet another in a long string of WP:AGF and WP:NPA problems with regards toward administrators. I don't see this latest problem as any different from the many you have had in the past. Jayron32 19:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Comment on 'abuse' claims:
- See the notes regarding this editor and their attitude towards admins here.
- Also note a propensity by this user to claim admin abuse when there is in fact none, (see the misuse of tools section in this history.) Nja 19:29, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Further, note the user has ran a recent 'admin abuse' campaign against me on the talk page at Talk:Provisional Irish Republican Army. He was warned against last week and yesterday about sidetracking the dispute resolution process and to file a complaint against me if he truly believes his claims (here and here). He was also warned yesterday about refactoring others' talk page comments and calling people trolls. Nja 21:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Note from blocking admin
I have removed this editor's ability to edit this talk page during block for removing unwanted comments above by Nja247 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) which were relevant to the unblock request. Other admins are free to reinstate that privilege if they feel its removal was excessive or restoring it might serve some other constructive purpose. Toddst1 (talk) 19:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- Excessive your having a laugh aren't you? BigDunc 21:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)