Revision as of 08:26, 22 September 2008 editHarrypotter1994 (talk | contribs)135 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:35, 5 July 2009 edit undoGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits fyiNext edit → | ||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
You're welcome. ] (]) 04:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | You're welcome. ] (]) 04:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Bad news== | |||
Another contributor nominated a long list of articles for deletion -- articles on fictional characters from the ] television show -- including three articles you started: | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
The deletion policies strongly recommend that the nominator tell good faith contributors when they nominate an article they started for deletion. I can't explain why this very experienced contributor failed to comply with the policies' recommendations. | |||
I'm sorry. Don't let this other contributor's lapses from policy discourage you from participating in the wikipedia. You can voice your opinion at the deletion discussion, or you can look at the concerns they expressed, and improve the article by trying to address them. | |||
If the articles end up being deleted before you next log on, and you have questions about why the articles were deleted, I think you should feel completely free to ask civil questions of the nominating contributor and the closing administrator. You can ask me too. | |||
Cheers! ] (]) 17:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 5 July 2009
|
Deo Volente
You're welcome. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Bad news
Another contributor nominated a long list of articles for deletion -- articles on fictional characters from the Home and Away television show -- including three articles you started:
The deletion policies strongly recommend that the nominator tell good faith contributors when they nominate an article they started for deletion. I can't explain why this very experienced contributor failed to comply with the policies' recommendations.
I'm sorry. Don't let this other contributor's lapses from policy discourage you from participating in the wikipedia. You can voice your opinion at the deletion discussion, or you can look at the concerns they expressed, and improve the article by trying to address them.
If the articles end up being deleted before you next log on, and you have questions about why the articles were deleted, I think you should feel completely free to ask civil questions of the nominating contributor and the closing administrator. You can ask me too.
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 17:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)