Misplaced Pages

Operation Bribie: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:55, 28 June 2009 editAnotherclown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers58,141 edits Tweaks to section headings, expanded lead← Previous edit Revision as of 00:00, 1 July 2009 edit undoAnotherclown (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers58,141 edits RewriteNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=September 2007}}
{{FixBunching|beg}} {{FixBunching|beg}}
{{Infobox Military Conflict {{Infobox Military Conflict
Line 7: Line 6:
|caption= |caption=
|date=17 February 1967 |date=17 February 1967
|place=Near Ap Lo Gom, ] Province, ] |place=Ap My An, Phuoc Tuy Province, ]
|result=Inconclusive
|casus=
|combatant1={{AUS}}
|territory=
|combatant2=] ] <br>{{flagicon|North Vietnam}} ]
|result=Indecisive
|commander1=Colin Townsend
|combatant1={{flag|Australia}}
|combatant2={{flagicon|Republic of South Vietnam}} ]
|commander1=]
|commander2=Unknown |commander2=Unknown
|strength1=200+ |strength1=One infantry battalion
|strength2=Unknown |strength2=Unknown
|casualties1=8 killed, 27 wounded |casualties1=8 killed<br/>26 wounded
|casualties2=Est. 50-100 killed (8 bodies recovered) |casualties2=50 to 70 killed
}} |}}
{{FixBunching|mid}} {{FixBunching|mid}}
{{Campaignbox Vietnam War}} {{Campaignbox Vietnam War}}
{{FixBunching|end}} {{FixBunching|end}}


'''Operation Bribie''', also known as the '''Battle of Ap My An''', was an Australian quick reaction operation during the ], taking place on 17 February 1967. The operation began with the ] setting out to establish a blocking force and prevent the withdrawal of ] forces following an unsuccessful ambush attempt. However, despite their best efforts, the soldiers of 6RAR were unable to stop the Viet Cong from withdrawing from the battlefield. '''Operation Bribie''', or the '''Battle of Ap My An''', was fought during the ] in Phyoc Tuy province on 17 February 1967 between ] from the ] and the ], reinforced by ] regulars. The battle was a hard fought affair and although significant casualties were inflicted on the insurgents the Australians were matched by a tenacious and disciplined force and were forced to withdraw overnight, before returning the next morning to find that the Viet Cong had also left the area. Indeed the vicious fighting at Ap My An was probably the closest the Australians came to defeat in a major battle during the war.

The result of battle remains in dispute, and some Australian soldiers stated afterward that they had been defeated, whilst their commanders proclaimed the operation a victory.


==Prelude== ==Prelude==
At 0600 on 17 February two Viet Cong companies from D445 Battalion had occupied the coastal village of ], in an attempt to engage ]. Heavy fighting ensued, and after five hours the attacking force had withdrawn to the north-east.<ref name=Coulthard285>Coulthard-Clark 2008, p. 285.</ref> Believing the Viet Cong would attempt withdraw as they had during previous encounters, forces from the ] (1ATF) were subsequently inserted to block their withdrawal.<ref name=Coulthard285/> The plan envisioned three companies from 6RAR landing by helicopter just north of the hamlet of Ap My An, and then linking up with the fourth company which would be inserted by ] Armoured Personnel Carriers from ]. The battalion would then patrol westward.<ref name=Coulthard285/>
Six months before the first shots of Operation Bribie were fired, a small force of 108 Australian and New Zealanders was nearly overrun by a larger Viet Cong force of 2,500 soldiers at the ]. With the help of artillery the ] soldiers soundly defeated the Viet Cong.

Little did they know, the Australian victory was to prove decisive and would shape the way local Viet Cong forces confront the Australian Task Force for the remainder of the conflict. As their influence declined in the region, the Viet Cong D445 Battalion and other units avoided major contacts with the ]. Instead they favoured attacking isolated outposts with the hope of drawing out a major relief force, and ambush them in the process.


==Battle== ==Battle==
However unbeknown to commander 1ATF—Brigadier Stuart Graham—the earlier attack on Phuoc Hai was in fact a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction from the Australians. As such there would be no withdrawal, and anticipating that any relief force would move by road, the Viet Cong established an extensive ] in the buildings alongside Route 44, which led into the village. Although the presence of the ambush was not detected, the Australian APCs under the command of Major Gordon Murphy carrying C Company avoided it, inserting instead by a cross-country route.<ref name=Coulthard285/><ref name=Horner187>Horner 2008, p. 187.</ref>
On the night of 16 February the small township of Lang Phuoc Hai came under Viet Cong attack, and the Regional Force that was surrounded managed to fight its way out as South Vietnamese and American firepower broke up the enemy attack.


After 1200 the first elements from A Company under Major Owen O’Brien began inserting by helicopter into an unsecured Landing Zone, and began the advance into the thick rainforest.<ref name=Coulthard285/> The Australians were soon contacted by heavy small arms fire, with a third of the lead platoon (5 Platoon) falling dead or wounded in the initial volleys. A Company subsequently broke contact and withdrew under heavy fire from what appeared to be an Viet Cong base area.<ref name=Horner187/> Unknown to the Australian’s the Viet Cong had now been reinforced by North Vietnamese regulars<ref name=Horner187/> and they now faced a ]-sized enemy in well prepared dug-in positions. Initially believing however that he only faced a ], the commanding officer of 6RAR—Lieutenant Colonel Colin Townsend—subsequently ordered a quick attack. <ref name=Coulthard285/>
The ] at Nui Dat learned of the Viet Cong
attack during the early hours of 17 February. At that point Brigadier Stuart Graham, commander of the Australian Task Force, decided to launch an operation with the 6RAR supported by ] armoured personnel carriers and artillery. However, due to the fear of a Viet Cong assault on the Australian base at Nui Dat, Brigadier Graham wanted the 6th Battalion to return to the base by nightfall. That combined with the lack of planning and reconnaissance would have negative consequences for the Australians.


Beginning at 1535 two companies were committed to the assault, which employed helicopters, communications, armoured mobility and artillery support. B Company was landed on the flank of the Viet Cong position and prepared to conduct the attack. C Company and D Company both moved to blocking positions, whilst A Company advanced and engaged the Viet Cong in fire support from a flank in an attempt to split their fire.<ref name=Horner187/> From the outset, however, the lead elements came under constant sniper fire from the trees, and from machine guns that had not previously been detected. The assault soon faltered with steadily increasing casualties.<ref name=Coulthard285/> A five hour close quarter battle ensued, and continued until night fell. The Australians assaulted the Viet Cong positions frontal tactics, resulting in heavy casualties on both sides.<ref name=Horner188>Horner 2008, p. 188.</ref> During the fighting an APC was disabled by a recoilless rifle at close range, killing the driver.<ref> McNeill and Ekins, 2003, p. 106.</ref>
The 6RAR-led reaction force left the Nui Dat base during the afternoon.The first wave, led by A Company, 6RAR, descended on the landing zone at 1.45pm. The Australians came under fire within minutes. As they pushed into the surrounding rainforest, the lead platoon was suddenly swept by rifle and machine-gun fire from its front and from snipers in the trees. It charged straight at the enemy positions, returning fire and hurling grenades. In less than a minute, six men were hit and the assault stalled under the weight of enemy fire. The company commander broke contact and pulled his men back to the forest edge.


Surrounded and receiving fire from all sides, the lead Australian elements were trapped and all attempts to regain momentum, including a ] by one platoon, also failed. The APCs had been used initially to secure the LZ at the jungle’s edge, however with the infantry in dire straits they were dispatched as a relief force. Fighting their way forward the APCs arrived by 1815 and began loading the most badly wounded. By 1850 the companies were able break contact and moved into a night harbour near the LZ. Heavy mortar and artillery fire, as well as airstrikes, covered the withdrawal and then pounded the battlefield during the evening.<ref name=Coulthard285/>
Just after 3.30pm, A and B companies pushed back into the timber. They quickly came under enemy fire. The soldiers of B Company, in the lead, advanced against concealed enemy troops, who were deployed in a wide arc and well dug in. The deeper they penetrated into the enemy position, the more their flanks were exposed to fire.


==Aftermath==
The entire B Company assault looked like getting bogged down. The commander of 5 Platoon was ordered to push forward as fast as possible to outflank Viet Cong machine gun positions and silence it. Due to the lack of coverage on his right flank, the commander of 5 Platoon received his orders with much apprehension.
After a tense night the Australians returned to the battlefield the following morning, only to find that the insurgents had also withdrawn, managing to avoided the pre-positioned blocking forces.<ref name=Coulthard285/> During the sweep the bodies of the Australian dead from 5 Platoon were located and recovered, as was the burnt out APC. On the side the Viet Cong had written in blood: “DU ME UC DAI LOI”, loosely translated as “Aussies Get Stuffed”.<ref>McNeill and Ekins, 2003, p. 109.</ref>


In the aftermath of the operation ] claimed that the Viet Cong had won a decisive victory. The Australians, on the other hand, also claimed a significant triumph and this view was reflected by Brigadier Graham when he said that the VC "got a thrashing", a claim supported by the intelligence assessment of Viet Cong casualties.<ref name=OperationBribie></ref> To be sure D445 Battalion was unable to mount a battalion-sized operation in Phuoc Tuy during the remainder of 1967.<ref name=Horner188/> Regardless some of the Australian soldiers who had participated in the operation believed otherwise. Private Robin Harris of 5 Platoon later wrote: “I think that on this occasion Charlie’s losses were overstated. It was us who had copped a hiding.” This view was also shared by APC commander David Clifton when he recalled: “We had been soundly thrashed on Operation Bribie.”<ref name=OperationBribie/>
Nonetheless the entire unit fixed their bayonets and charged at enemy gun positions before the attack was faltered at 25m. The men of 5 Platoon were pinned down so close to Viet Cong positions that they could neither move forward or backward. As A Company locked into vicious combat with the Viet Cong, the entire B Company were in a desperate situation with scores of dead and wounded men. Casualties build up when two artillery shells fell short and struck 5 Platoon's position.

Whilst under pressure from Brigadier Graham, Lieutenant Colonel Townsend ordered his battalion and the supporting armoured personnel carriers to assemble on the Landing Zone to return to the base. And when it became obvious that A and B Companies could not disengage from the firefight, a small force of ]s was dispatched to help. At 1815 hours the armoured personnel carriers found the beleaguered companies after a one hour search. But tragedy struck again as the lead APC was knocked out by an anti-tank weapon, killing the driver and wounding several others.

The next morning the 6th Battalion launched another attack with all the rifle companies sweeping the battlefield, but the Viet Cong had withdrawn from the area.

==Aftermath==
Operation Bribie ended with high casualties on both sides. For the Australian 6th Battalion and other supporting arms the total casualties were 8 killed and 27 wounded, plus one destroyed M-113. On the side of the disabled vehicle, `DU ME UC DAI LO' (Aussies Get Stuffed) was wrtitten. For the Viet Cong, eight bodies were recovered by Australian troops, but the real number is largely unknown.


The fighting had cost 6RAR seven killed and 26 wounded, whilst the cavalry also lost one man killed and an APC destroyed.<ref name=Coulthard285/> Just eight Viet Cong bodies were recovered from the battlefield, although many more had obviously been removed. Later intelligence reports assessed their losses as between 50 and 70 killed.<ref name=Coulthard286>Coulthard-Clark 2008, p. 286.</ref> However despite the casualties inflicted the battle was no victory for the Australians who had also suffered very heavy casualties, and had been matched by their enemy in bravery and determination. Instead the battle was probably the closest the Australians came to defeat in a major battle in Vietnam<ref name=Coulthard286/> with the Viet Cong had withstanding numerous Australian assaults as well as heavy artillery, mortar and aerial bombardment.<ref name=Horner188>Horner 2008, p. 188.</ref>
Like other battles between the Viet Cong and Australian troops, the result is the subject of contention between the Vietnamese and Australian militaries. In the aftermath of the operation, ] claimed that the Viet Cong won a decisive victory. The Australians, on the other hand, also claimed a significant triumph over their enemy, and this view was reflected by the 1ATF commander Brigadier Stuart Graham when he said that the VC "got a thrashing". The Australian victory claim was supported by intelligence reports that the Viet Cong had suffered 50-100 casualties.


==Notes==
Whilst their commanders made claims of victory, the Australian soldiers who had participated in the operation firmly believe that they were soundly defeated. Intelligence reports of high Viet Cong casualties were dismissed as grossly inflated, as Private Robin Harris of 5 Platoon later wrote: ''"I think that on this occasion Charlie's losses were overstated. It was us who had copped a hiding." '' This view was shared by APC commander David Clifton when he recalled: ''"We had been soundly thrashed on Operation Bribie."''<ref></ref>
{{Reflist}}


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{refbegin}}
*{{cite book |last=Coulthard-Clark |first=Chris |title=The Encyclopaedia of Australia's Battles |year=2001|edition=Second |publisher=Allen and Unwin |location=Crows Nest |isbn=1865086347}}
*{{cite book | last = Horner (ed) | first = David | authorlink = | year = 2008 | title = Duty First: A History of the Royal Australian Regiment. Second Edition | publisher = Allen & Unwin | location = Crows Nest | isbn = 9781741753745}}
*{{cite book |last=McNeill |first=Ian |coauthors=Ashley Ekins |title=On the Offensive: The Australian Army and the Vietnam War 1967–1968 |publisher=Allen & Unwin |location=St Leonards |year=2003 |edition= |isbn=1863733043}}
{{refend}}


{{coord missing|Vietnam}}
==External links==
*
*
*


{{DEFAULTSORT:Bribie}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Bribie}}
] ]
]
] ]
] ]

Revision as of 00:00, 1 July 2009

Template:FixBunching

Operation Bribie
Part of the Vietnam War
Date17 February 1967
LocationAp My An, Phuoc Tuy Province, South Vietnam
Result Inconclusive
Belligerents
 Australia Viet Cong
North Vietnam North Vietnam
Commanders and leaders
Colin Townsend Unknown
Strength
One infantry battalion Unknown
Casualties and losses
8 killed
26 wounded
50 to 70 killed

Template:FixBunching

Military engagements during the Vietnam War
Guerrilla phase

American intervention 1965

1966

1967

Tet Offensive and aftermath

Vietnamization 1969–1971

1972

Post-Paris Peace Accords (1973–1974)

Spring 1975

Air operations

Naval operations

Lists of allied operations

Template:FixBunching

Operation Bribie, or the Battle of Ap My An, was fought during the Vietnam War in Phyoc Tuy province on 17 February 1967 between Australian forces from the 6th Battalion, Royal Australian Regiment and the Viet Cong, reinforced by North Vietnamese regulars. The battle was a hard fought affair and although significant casualties were inflicted on the insurgents the Australians were matched by a tenacious and disciplined force and were forced to withdraw overnight, before returning the next morning to find that the Viet Cong had also left the area. Indeed the vicious fighting at Ap My An was probably the closest the Australians came to defeat in a major battle during the war.

Prelude

At 0600 on 17 February two Viet Cong companies from D445 Battalion had occupied the coastal village of Phuoc Hai, in an attempt to engage South Vietnamese forces. Heavy fighting ensued, and after five hours the attacking force had withdrawn to the north-east. Believing the Viet Cong would attempt withdraw as they had during previous encounters, forces from the 1st Australian Task Force (1ATF) were subsequently inserted to block their withdrawal. The plan envisioned three companies from 6RAR landing by helicopter just north of the hamlet of Ap My An, and then linking up with the fourth company which would be inserted by M-113 Armoured Personnel Carriers from A Squadron, 3rd Cavalry Regiment. The battalion would then patrol westward.

Battle

However unbeknown to commander 1ATF—Brigadier Stuart Graham—the earlier attack on Phuoc Hai was in fact a deliberate attempt to provoke a reaction from the Australians. As such there would be no withdrawal, and anticipating that any relief force would move by road, the Viet Cong established an extensive ambush in the buildings alongside Route 44, which led into the village. Although the presence of the ambush was not detected, the Australian APCs under the command of Major Gordon Murphy carrying C Company avoided it, inserting instead by a cross-country route.

After 1200 the first elements from A Company under Major Owen O’Brien began inserting by helicopter into an unsecured Landing Zone, and began the advance into the thick rainforest. The Australians were soon contacted by heavy small arms fire, with a third of the lead platoon (5 Platoon) falling dead or wounded in the initial volleys. A Company subsequently broke contact and withdrew under heavy fire from what appeared to be an Viet Cong base area. Unknown to the Australian’s the Viet Cong had now been reinforced by North Vietnamese regulars and they now faced a battalion-sized enemy in well prepared dug-in positions. Initially believing however that he only faced a company, the commanding officer of 6RAR—Lieutenant Colonel Colin Townsend—subsequently ordered a quick attack.

Beginning at 1535 two companies were committed to the assault, which employed helicopters, communications, armoured mobility and artillery support. B Company was landed on the flank of the Viet Cong position and prepared to conduct the attack. C Company and D Company both moved to blocking positions, whilst A Company advanced and engaged the Viet Cong in fire support from a flank in an attempt to split their fire. From the outset, however, the lead elements came under constant sniper fire from the trees, and from machine guns that had not previously been detected. The assault soon faltered with steadily increasing casualties. A five hour close quarter battle ensued, and continued until night fell. The Australians assaulted the Viet Cong positions frontal tactics, resulting in heavy casualties on both sides. During the fighting an APC was disabled by a recoilless rifle at close range, killing the driver.

Surrounded and receiving fire from all sides, the lead Australian elements were trapped and all attempts to regain momentum, including a bayonet charge by one platoon, also failed. The APCs had been used initially to secure the LZ at the jungle’s edge, however with the infantry in dire straits they were dispatched as a relief force. Fighting their way forward the APCs arrived by 1815 and began loading the most badly wounded. By 1850 the companies were able break contact and moved into a night harbour near the LZ. Heavy mortar and artillery fire, as well as airstrikes, covered the withdrawal and then pounded the battlefield during the evening.

Aftermath

After a tense night the Australians returned to the battlefield the following morning, only to find that the insurgents had also withdrawn, managing to avoided the pre-positioned blocking forces. During the sweep the bodies of the Australian dead from 5 Platoon were located and recovered, as was the burnt out APC. On the side the Viet Cong had written in blood: “DU ME UC DAI LOI”, loosely translated as “Aussies Get Stuffed”.

In the aftermath of the operation Hanoi claimed that the Viet Cong had won a decisive victory. The Australians, on the other hand, also claimed a significant triumph and this view was reflected by Brigadier Graham when he said that the VC "got a thrashing", a claim supported by the intelligence assessment of Viet Cong casualties. To be sure D445 Battalion was unable to mount a battalion-sized operation in Phuoc Tuy during the remainder of 1967. Regardless some of the Australian soldiers who had participated in the operation believed otherwise. Private Robin Harris of 5 Platoon later wrote: “I think that on this occasion Charlie’s losses were overstated. It was us who had copped a hiding.” This view was also shared by APC commander David Clifton when he recalled: “We had been soundly thrashed on Operation Bribie.”

The fighting had cost 6RAR seven killed and 26 wounded, whilst the cavalry also lost one man killed and an APC destroyed. Just eight Viet Cong bodies were recovered from the battlefield, although many more had obviously been removed. Later intelligence reports assessed their losses as between 50 and 70 killed. However despite the casualties inflicted the battle was no victory for the Australians who had also suffered very heavy casualties, and had been matched by their enemy in bravery and determination. Instead the battle was probably the closest the Australians came to defeat in a major battle in Vietnam with the Viet Cong had withstanding numerous Australian assaults as well as heavy artillery, mortar and aerial bombardment.

Notes

  1. ^ Coulthard-Clark 2008, p. 285.
  2. ^ Horner 2008, p. 187.
  3. ^ Horner 2008, p. 188.
  4. McNeill and Ekins, 2003, p. 106.
  5. McNeill and Ekins, 2003, p. 109.
  6. ^ Operation BRIBIE Victory or Defeat
  7. ^ Coulthard-Clark 2008, p. 286.

References

  • Coulthard-Clark, Chris (2001). The Encyclopaedia of Australia's Battles (Second ed.). Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin. ISBN 1865086347.
  • Horner (ed), David (2008). Duty First: A History of the Royal Australian Regiment. Second Edition. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 9781741753745. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  • McNeill, Ian (2003). On the Offensive: The Australian Army and the Vietnam War 1967–1968. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin. ISBN 1863733043. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Categories:
Operation Bribie: Difference between revisions Add topic