| Revision as of 15:24, 7 March 2009 editTimeshifter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,552 edits Talk:Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties#Criticism in lead sections. | Revision as of 03:12, 15 March 2009 edit undoDynablaster (talk | contribs)3,599 edits →Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties: New ScientistNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Please see ]. --] (]) 15:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | Please see ]. --] (]) 15:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Take my advice and read ]. ''New Scientist'' is a reliable third-party source and the information is notable. It's not our business to judge whether the information is truthful or not. The same rule applies to every source on the page. ] (]) 03:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:12, 15 March 2009
Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties
Please see Talk:Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties#Criticism in lead sections. --Timeshifter (talk) 15:24, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Take my advice and read WP:VER. New Scientist is a reliable third-party source and the information is notable. It's not our business to judge whether the information is truthful or not. The same rule applies to every source on the page. Dynablaster (talk) 03:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)