User talk:Wikipedius Reparo: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:02, 6 March 2009 editHistopher Critchens (talk \| contribs)113 edits →Botched block review of Histopher Critchens and Wikipedius Reparo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:23, 6 March 2009 edit undoJpgordon (talk \| contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,535 editsm Reverted edits by Histopher Critchens (talk) to last version by FisherQueenNext edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	Regarding : some of us are perfectly capable of reading and filing a report, thank you very much. Just because I may be new doesn't make me an idiot.		Regarding : some of us are perfectly capable of reading and filing a report, thank you very much. Just because I may be new doesn't make me an idiot.

	== Botched block review of ] and ] ==

	{{unblock}}

	Please see this ]: <blockquote>], I am not ]. ] is not ]. The claim that my " are suspicious" is absurd -- back this up with '''''one single example, rather than tossing around unsupported allegations'''''. Please unblock ]'s account. I can understand honest mistakes, but this is becoming ridiculous -- I'll file a complaint against the offending admins unless you all clean this up quickly. ] (]) 15:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)</blockquote> ] (]) 15:48, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
	:P.S. WR, As ] points out ], I reverted several of your unencyclopedic edits to the ] article. If they ever unfoul their mistake and unblock your account, please don't add stuff like that -- doesn't help. ] (]) 16:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:23, 6 March 2009

Sock block

I've blocked you indefinitely as a sock of user:Histopher Critchens. Please complain here (or, less convincingly, there) William M. Connolley (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipedius Reparo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

You look so much like the same user that I can't justify unblocking you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not a "sock" of anyone. I see that this false allegation has been made here as well. This is uncalled for and I request to be unblocked.

Please see this: . I reported this IP address after noticing the odd behavior on wherein multiple IP addresses were coming in and each edit warring on the page, going against (in total) users Histopher Critchens, Fram, AlasdairGreen27, and Jeff5102. I could probably have also reported diffs like this one but felt it sufficient at the time to report the three main recent addresses.

Again, I am not a "sock" of Histopher Critchens or anyone else and I request to have my account unblocked. Thank you.

Regarding : some of us are perfectly capable of reading and filing a report, thank you very much. Just because I may be new doesn't make me an idiot.