| Revision as of 09:31, 4 February 2009 editChris G (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators20,818 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:The JPS": Excessive vandalism ( (expires 15:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)) (indefinite))← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:08, 5 February 2009 edit undoHc baby.jpg (talk | contribs)5 edits HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHANext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <big><big><big><big><big><big><big>A | |||
| {| class="infobox" width="270px" | |||
| |- | |||
| !align="center"|]<br>] | |||
| ---- | |||
| |- | |||
| | | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| * | |||
| |}<!--Template:Talkarchives--> | |||
| == Spin-off, character pages == | |||
| When first writing, for example, ] character page, I thought it was written in 'an in-universe style'. However in retrospect this does not seem to be the case entirely, and I will be reviewing the page shortly. | |||
| Just a quick point on 'Edio*Magica', although it wasn't you who blocked me directly, it was still rather silly to think I would vandalize the very pages I have been improving (], ]), and to think that I would replace content with insults directed at myself. Due to the blocking I had to create this new account in order to edit pages, but I'm willing to forgive and forget about the misunderstanding. ] (]) 15:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :It wouldn't be the first time that someone has disrupted Misplaced Pages. In the past, we've had people create vandalism on one account, so that they can look good on another by fighting it. I realise, though, that your case is that there are probably some other bored little school kids using the same computer pool as you. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well i'm glad you've seen sense. What makes their actions even more pathetic is the fact they're university students; nevertheless they seem to have stopped now. ] (]) 18:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Why don't you try and build an article to ] standard, and get a better idea of conventions? Many of the articles you edit really could do with reliable sources. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Image removed from ] == | |||
| Are you sure the image you removed is not perfectly acceptable? It is a screen shot I took of the series so doesn't belong to any organization, and from what I’ve read relevant screen shots adding to an article are acceptable. I think you should have discussed your action before carrying it out. ] (]) 15:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Having seen sitcom articles through FAC, I'm sure. Non-free images can only be used if they convey information that words couldn't express. My action was in accordance with the knowledge I possess through extensive ediing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's policy and guidelines, rather than ones I make up as I go along. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:44, 25 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for Jaws (novel) == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}} --> ] (]) 22:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Edito*Magica == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Do you know if there is any way I can have the 'Edito*Magica' account unblocked? Thanks ] (]) 17:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <big><big><big><big><big><big><big>FUCKING | |||
| == Regarding Edito*Magica == | |||
| He's been rather obviously abusing sockpuppet accounts as "Good Hand/Bad Hand" accounts where one account vandalises an article and another cleans it up. He was blocked when an Autoblock showed that the SAME articles were being vandalised by one account, and then his account was cleaning them up. Being caught by an autoblock in this manner shows that the same IP address was responsible for both vandalising the same articles and cleaning them up. He also sent some emails which implied that you were abusing your admin power in declining his unblock request. See ], which was the account that when blocked activated the Autoblock against Edito*Magica, as well as the suspicious ]. He claims innocence in the matter, and I told him that if he wanted to edit, he should contact ArbCom. Please block his new accounts as a violation of Misplaced Pages policy. He should contact ArbCom and follow the rules if he wants to edit. I see no evidence of wanting to abide by the rules, and the continued abuse of multiple accounts seems rediculous. --].].] 19:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, looks like evertone else got to it before me... Anyhoo, this guy knows he's supposed to email ArbCom to plead his case, but I can't see that going well for him. If he just continues to create new accounts, he will continue to be blocked until he follows the rules. --].].] 03:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, Well yes Im on it, but there's not much information about, so anyway it will end a stub ¿Should I Continue? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| *Well, now is a bit better, still need some improvement and images ¿It's enough to not be erased? --] (]) 00:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :That's fine now, thanks. You never know about new pages... some people put minimal content and run away! I usually draft an article in user space (e.g. ]) before creating in mainspace. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == MetaCASE tool == | |||
| Please look at ]. It's the top of the software tree, not used for detail articles. Could you please find an appropriate category for this article. Thanks. | |||
| There is also a discussion ]. ] (]) 02:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :I was on new pages patrol. I put it in the parent cat so someone more knowledgeable about the topic could put it in an appropriate home. I am well aware about subcategories.That's the way I prefer to work when I'm dealing with new pages; spending time working out a category hierarchy takes time from vandal fighting, etc. ]<sup>]</sup> 13:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Thanks for the LOL! There is no spoon. :) ] (]) 03:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big><big>PAEDOPHILE!!!!! | |||
Revision as of 10:08, 5 February 2009
A
FUCKING
PAEDOPHILE!!!!!