Misplaced Pages

User talk:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:57, 3 February 2009 editAitias (talk | contribs)Rollbackers50,076 edits Rollback: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:07, 3 February 2009 edit undoRenamedUser jaskldjslak903 (talk | contribs)9,168 editsm I'm not leaving the project, I'm just going to start fresh using a new, hidden usernameNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{db-user}}
'''Please don't spam me with stuff like newsletters, and GA reviews, I will ignore it. Also because of long standing harassment from ED, my user talk page is semi-protected. If you are a IP or a new editor and need to speak to me, leave me a message ]. Also note if you come only to vandalize or harass me, it WON'T WORK, and I'm more than willing to give a nice block and contact your IP server (depends on how severe it is)'''

{{col-begin}}

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


{{col-break}}
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-break}}

*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

{{col-end}}

== Retirement ==

Sigh. ] gets worse by the moment. Good luck, and hopefully you'll be at BN asking for the bit back later this year. Very best. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 18:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

:Secret, best of luck on those classes. You will be missed here. Be well! ] (]) 05:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

== WikiProject College football ] ==
The ''']''' of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.<br /><small>This has been an automated delivery by ] (]) 02:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</small>

== Misplaced Pages Review link ==

No need to apologize to me. Especially because the leaked checkuser data actually gave me more of an idea what the hell actually happened with those accounts. More substantively, what evidence do you have that that leak or other leaks were leaked by FT2? ] (]) 22:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Because I was the one who went to FT2 first in IRC when I first saw the sock. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:00, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

: Yes I was aware of that but that's not evidence that FT2 leaked anything. That leak occurred after the Arb's had already been discussing the matter for some time as you can see from the leaked content. If I recall, you noticed Gothnic on the 8th and Kohs didn't post his email until the 15th. More seriously, FT2 was one of the Arb's who was more willing to listen to my defense which isn't very consistent with him leaking that data. ] (]) 23:04, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

] I replied there, I apologized to FT2 there, but I still found some evidence that I believe who the editor is, but I'm emailing this to ArbCom, and also expect an email from me tommorrow. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

== Catherine Banfield in ER ==

Hi, I just wanted to know why did you redirected the individual Catherine Banfield's page to the Supporting Characters Page. I know that she was already mentioned there, but she is a regular character and every single character has their own page, except for her.

Cheers. ] (]) 01:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

== Eww @ Math Classes ==

I sympathize with math courses... the 8-week ones are worse because they go twice as fast as normal classes do. Hope you do well. I've got three more math courses before I can grab my math minor... :( ] <sup>''<font color="#660000">] ♦ ] ♦ ]''</font></sup> 08:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

==Danforth Carhouse and Bus Garage==
Hi. Thanks for detecting the weirdness with this article. I've removed the speedy, because the deletion was evidently contentious and the deleting admin has it up for AfD again, ]. But for some resaon, was removed and probably would have stayed off if it had not caught your eye. :) --] <sup>]</sup> 17:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

== Please reconsider your closure of ] ==

Hello. You recently closed this AfD even though the discussion had not yet lasted five days. Current policy (see ]) as well as current consensus (see ]) provide that AfD discussions must run for at least five days. Accordingly, I'd like to ask you to please undo your closure and relist the AfD. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 22:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I second this. I also feel the outcome of this AfD did not reflect the consensus and I ask that you please reconsider.--] ]/] 23:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Take it to ], I only closed it 12 hours early, and just about every other AFD was closed by then. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

==Deletion review for ]==
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> ] ]/] 16:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

== thank you ==

<center>
{| cellspacing="5" cellpadding="10" valign="top" style="width:60%; vertical-align:top; background:#f5faff;border:1px solid #B6B2B2;"
|-
| width="90%" | My RFA ]. I wanted to thank you for weighing in, and I wanted to let you know I appreciated all of the comments, advice, criticism, and seriously took it all to heart this past week. I'll do my absolute best to not let any of you down with the incredible trust given me today. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 08:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
| width="10%" | <center>]</center>
|}</center>

== RFC ==

I seriously suggest you tag it for deletion, while you still can. These things can turn ugly (I was desysopped following a rather drama-filled RFC). If you really want review, get an editor review. I think you're an OK editor, but you're too unstable for adminship, since you quit so many times. I'd expect you to wait a little longer than a few weeks after resigning. I understand you're busy with school and whatnot, but flipflopping isn't good. ''']''' ] 18:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
:Agree with Majorly on the RFC. This was handled..... poorly, by a number of people. <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">] : ] </span></small> 19:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
:Agreed---and you might want to check out the discussion related to your request, I just asked you a question based upon a compromise I think we reached with Majorly.---''']''' '']'' 20:36, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

== Rollback ==

Hey. Per your request I have rollback to you. Best wishes, — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;] 21:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:07, 3 February 2009

Please use the rationale parameter to explain why this user talk page should be deleted. (E.g., {{db-u1|rationale= }}.) Thanks!

Per the User page guidelines, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons. In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libellous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight.

Users who have left Misplaced Pages may be added to Misplaced Pages:Missing Wikipedians.

User talk:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901: Difference between revisions Add topic