| Revision as of 17:35, 13 January 2009 editGreg L (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,897 edits →Italicizing of g (acceleration): posted← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:59, 14 January 2009 edit undoHipocrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,615 edits →Edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| ==Italicizing of g (acceleration)== | ==Italicizing of g (acceleration)== | ||
| Wolfkeeper. There is a discussion going on here at ] regarding your italicizing the unit symbol g in the discipline of acceleration. Your assertion that the unit symbol must be italicized needs to be cited. It does not appear to me to be correct. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">''']''' (])</span> 17:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | Wolfkeeper. There is a discussion going on here at ] regarding your italicizing the unit symbol g in the discipline of acceleration. Your assertion that the unit symbol must be italicized needs to be cited. It does not appear to me to be correct. <span style="white-space:nowrap;">''']''' (])</span> 17:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| Please don't edit war. When a user writes "see talk" in their edit summary, it's likley that they are in the process of posting something to explain their edit. To revert them without comment is rude - it's engaging in ] and is generally unhelpful. Please discuss things on talk and seek consensus. Thanks! ] (]) 17:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:59, 14 January 2009
Click here to leave a new messageReferences
Eva Peron article
Thank you for your intervention. I was wondering if maybe you could intervene in what seems to be something of a conflict with User:Pigsonthewing. I finally bowed and included in the intro paragraphs a reference to the musical. He rewrote it and said that I used uncited "weasil words." He then included a reference which he himself didn't cite either. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that "Outside of Argentina she is perhaps most famously known as the subect of the musiscal Evita." I request your intervention on this because I fear that this is going to continue. Thank you. -- Andrew Parodi (talk) 22:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll find a source. I will also note that his contribution that "She is known for the musical Evita" was also uncited. -- Andrew Parodi (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for your earlier intervention. Is there any way you could intervene again? Pigsonthewing and I are having some difficulty. Thanks. -- Andrew Parodi (talk) 19:50, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Scope of articles
Hi Wolfkeeper. I was wondering whether you would have any objection to me contacting a number of people who have been involved in editing articles that you have rescoped to find out whether the rescope was indeed the product of a consensus decision? I wanted to clear this with you first in order to avoid any possible accusation of WP:Canvassing by you at some later point. --Rlandmann (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- I can't see how that would be in any way appropriate.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 21:12, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you want to challenge consensus in any article, you should do it in the normal ways.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 21:13, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Italicizing of g (acceleration)
Wolfkeeper. There is a discussion going on here at Talk:G-force#Italicizing regarding your italicizing the unit symbol g in the discipline of acceleration. Your assertion that the unit symbol must be italicized needs to be cited. It does not appear to me to be correct. Greg L (talk) 17:35, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Edit warring
Please don't edit war. When a user writes "see talk" in their edit summary, it's likley that they are in the process of posting something to explain their edit. To revert them without comment is rude - it's engaging in Edit Warring and is generally unhelpful. Please discuss things on talk and seek consensus. Thanks! Hipocrite (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)