Misplaced Pages

:Naming conventions (flora): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:36, 29 December 2008 editGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits rv, stop disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point← Previous edit Revision as of 00:12, 30 December 2008 edit undoBorn2cycle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,496 edits Undid revision 260747363 by Guettarda (talk) perhaps we need a vote?Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions}} {{main|Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions}}


''The naming conventions that apply to flora have been extensively discussed and continue to be discussed on the WikiProject Plants ], and the following guidelines have broad consensus approval.'' ''The naming conventions that apply to flora have been extensively discussed and continue to be discussed on the WikiProject Plants ]..''


== Article title == == Article title ==

Revision as of 00:12, 30 December 2008

Blue tickThis guideline documents an English Misplaced Pages naming convention.
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.
Shortcut
Red question markThis page's designation as a policy or guideline is disputed or under discussion. Please see the relevant talk page discussion for further information.

A working draft of proposed changes can be found at Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (flora)/Draft

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions

The naming conventions that apply to flora have been extensively discussed and continue to be discussed on the WikiProject Plants talk page..

Article title

Article naming for flora articles differs from the standard Tree of Life policy in the following ways:

Scientific names are to be used as page titles in all cases except the following, as determined on a case-by-case basis through discussion on the WikiProject Plants talk page:

  1. Agricultural and horticultural cases in which multiple different products stem from the same scientific name (eg. brussels sprouts, cabbage & broccoli). In such a case, a separate page with the botanical description of the entire species is preferred (eg. Brassica oleracea).
  2. Plants that are sufficiently significant economically or culturally should be given a page describing their use, history and associations, with their common name as a page title. Example: coffee. Simultaneously, a separate page titled with the plant's scientific name should be created; this would be the place for botanical descriptions and relationships. Example: Coffea.
  3. Where a genus is monospecific (has only a single species), the article should be named after the genus, with the species name as a redirect. If a family contains only one genus, the article should still be at the genus name, as that is more likely to be commonly recognised.

Common names are to redirect to scientific names.

All known current English common names for a taxon should be listed in the plant article.

  • Hesperoyucca whipplei (Our Lord's Candle, Spanish Bayonet, Quixote Yucca, Common Yucca; syn. Yucca whipplei) is a species of flowering plant...

In cases where multiple taxa share the same common name, a disambiguation page should be used.

See also

Category:
Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (flora): Difference between revisions Add topic