Revision as of 14:40, 13 November 2008 editJayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits stopit | Revision as of 21:59, 15 December 2008 edit undoJayron32 (talk | contribs)105,509 edits →Moderating disputes: new sectionNext edit → | ||
(12 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Meenas|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --].].] 14:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Meenas|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --].].] 14:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Hello, | |||
Thanks for this message. I am trying to prevent this "edit war". Please my notes on the Discussion Page. The other editor is not following rules. Tags should not be removed without providing satisfactory arguments on the discussion page. Kindly enforce the rules about removing tags. I have already used to talk page but the other editor is not following any rules. Kindly advise how this article can be made more accurate within wikipedia rules--] (]) 14:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)--] (]) 14:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== meenas == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Meenas|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Archives== | |||
Satyashodak, archiving does not make issues "go away", it's just moving older messages to another page. There is no need to keep messages from four years ago on the main talkpage. If you feel that the issues are still unresolved, then please start a new thread. You can easily provide a pointer to the previous discussions in archives. --]]] 02:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Elonka, I am surprised you are showing such zeal to archive the issues that just got started last week. Kindly allow discussion. --] (]) 14:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I did not archive the issues from last week. I ''moved'' the threads. Older threads go at the top, newer threads at the bottom. All recent discussions are still there. --]]] 20:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
==] vs ]== | |||
YOu might also look at extremist accusations levelled by Prashad in ] that's repeatedly been placed there by ].] (]) 00:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thanks.There is documentary evidence of his sympathies with FARC, a Columbian terrorist group. Watch and contribute on ] article. Regards.--] (]) 01:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Cheers, <font color="#0000FF">]</font>''<font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>'' 12:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
==3RR== | |||
] Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits{{#if:|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. The ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- {{uw-3rr1}} --> ] (]) 23:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
I think this applies more to you than me. I have already referred this dispute to the moderators. --] (]) 00:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Moderating disputes == | |||
I am not particularly skilled in moderating these sorts of disputes. May I recommend that you seek help from ] where there ARE many options for seeking people who can help with these sorts of things? --].].] 21:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:59, 15 December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meenas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 14:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for this message. I am trying to prevent this "edit war". Please my notes on the Discussion Page. The other editor is not following rules. Tags should not be removed without providing satisfactory arguments on the discussion page. Kindly enforce the rules about removing tags. I have already used to talk page but the other editor is not following any rules. Kindly advise how this article can be made more accurate within wikipedia rules--Satyashodak (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)--Satyashodak (talk) 14:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
meenas
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meenas. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Kingturtle (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Archives
Satyashodak, archiving does not make issues "go away", it's just moving older messages to another page. There is no need to keep messages from four years ago on the main talkpage. If you feel that the issues are still unresolved, then please start a new thread. You can easily provide a pointer to the previous discussions in archives. --Elonka 02:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Elonka, I am surprised you are showing such zeal to archive the issues that just got started last week. Kindly allow discussion. --Satyashodak (talk) 14:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
- I did not archive the issues from last week. I moved the threads. Older threads go at the top, newer threads at the bottom. All recent discussions are still there. --Elonka 20:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Sonal Shah vs Vijay Prashad
YOu might also look at extremist accusations levelled by Prashad in Hindu Students Council here that's repeatedly been placed there by User:Relata refero.70.112.6.56 (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks.There is documentary evidence of his sympathies with FARC, a Columbian terrorist group. Watch and contribute on Vijay Prashad article. Regards.--Satyashodak (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
3RR
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Mitsube (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I think this applies more to you than me. I have already referred this dispute to the moderators. --Satyashodak (talk) 00:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Moderating disputes
I am not particularly skilled in moderating these sorts of disputes. May I recommend that you seek help from WP:DR where there ARE many options for seeking people who can help with these sorts of things? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:59, 15 December 2008 (UTC)