| Revision as of 11:01, 15 November 2008 editStepho-wrs (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,989 editsm →November 2008← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:30, 15 November 2008 edit undoLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,650 edits →November 2008: add block template and extended commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :Multiple editors have been reverting your edits to ]. Most of us are probably biased towards Toyota (at least I am) but we are still open to unpleasant facts if they are presented with good citations and without malice. Discussing them on the ] first will also go a long way to convincing us. Please talk with us. ] (]) 11:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | :Multiple editors have been reverting your edits to ]. Most of us are probably biased towards Toyota (at least I am) but we are still open to unpleasant facts if they are presented with good citations and without malice. Discussing them on the ] first will also go a long way to convincing us. Please talk with us. ] (]) 11:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''reason'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 13:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 --> I have blocked you for 31 hours for disrupting the editing of ] related articles. I understand that you wish to include material that is critical of the company, but you do need to achieve ] for the appropriate inclusion of such content; stating your case and re-inserting your preferred text (some sourced to blogs, which are not considered reliable sources) is not the appropriate method. I suggest you use the enforced break to review the various policies and guidelines in editing articles, and the proper use of talkpages, and <u>discuss</u> your proposed additions to the articles when the block expires. You will find that this is the best way of including the details you wish into the article. ] (]) 13:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your recent edits== | ==Your recent edits== | ||
Revision as of 13:30, 15 November 2008
November 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Toyota Motor Manufacturing Texas appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Kuru 20:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- You seem to be confused. Please read our policy on reliable sources. Please stop inserting your own conclusions based on blogs. Thanks. Kuru 21:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. The three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Kuru 04:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
You continue to add information to the Toyota article that is poorly sourced and not written from a neutral point of view. If you keep on adding this material to the article without re-writing it in neutral language or providing better sources, you could be blocked. Please discuss this on the article talk page with other editors. Sunray (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- It might be useful for you to read WP:CON. Note the following statement: "Consensus is Misplaced Pages's fundamental model for editorial decision-making." What that means is that if several editors say they don't agree with something, that carries weight. Three editors have expressed concerns about the material you are trying to add to the article. They agree that there are problems with it. You need to respect that consensus. Sunray (talk) 09:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Toyota, you will be blocked from editing. Sunray (talk) 10:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
- Multiple editors have been reverting your edits to Toyota. Most of us are probably biased towards Toyota (at least I am) but we are still open to unpleasant facts if they are presented with good citations and without malice. Discussing them on the discussion page first will also go a long way to convincing us. Please talk with us. Stepho-wrs (talk) 11:01, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
I have blocked you for 31 hours for disrupting the editing of Toyota related articles. I understand that you wish to include material that is critical of the company, but you do need to achieve WP:Consensus for the appropriate inclusion of such content; stating your case and re-inserting your preferred text (some sourced to blogs, which are not considered reliable sources) is not the appropriate method. I suggest you use the enforced break to review the various policies and guidelines in editing articles, and the proper use of talkpages, and discuss your proposed additions to the articles when the block expires. You will find that this is the best way of including the details you wish into the article. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 10:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC)