Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:39, 23 August 2008

Template:Archive box collapsible

Pokémon article

I undid your move of "Pokémon (anime)" to "Pokémon (TV series)" because the article also includes discussion of the Pokémon movies and DVD only specials, which are not part of the TV series. You also stated that "Anime is unnecessarily vague" in your move, but I don't see anything vague about it. "Anime" is Japanese animation, and the article covers all of the Pokémon anime. -- HiEv 23:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Video games noted for negative reaction

Sorry about that; I didn't go through the history when I reverted your edit. I saw "big block of text removed" and immediately figured it to be vandalism. I didn't think; my apologies. --tennisman 21:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Haha, that's VERY belated. My birthday is in December :P Those greetings are from my First Edit Day, which was ~two weeks ago. --tennisman 21:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, there, Mr. rules, here's something you should check out before reverting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by I am a jedi (talk • contribs) 01:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

guess what, it does. quality is how much information it provides minus false info, think about that. I am a jedi (talk) 02:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

no sources, then what do you call the "gamespot gave it a this", or, "ign gave it a that", that ends each and every entry? just because you can't see it on the reference page doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I am a jedi (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

look, which ever way you want it, ignore or adhere, the article is perfect as is and does NOT need you to say otherwise. i was, of course, saying that we should ignore the rule of putting the sources on the references section, but let the article live as it HAS sources from gaming websites. I am a jedi (talk) 07:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Archive

It appears that your archive bot has been deleted, would you like me to archive your talk page manually?--SRXHeat 17:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

 Done SRXHeat 18:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

GAMEFAQS is not a source.

GAMEFAQS is not a source. please read http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources. Also please see the talk page before removing important information.

List of Xbox 360 games

List of Playstation 3 games both don't include your "Australia" and they were not dumb to take out a whole bunch of important information as you did. I believe you live in "Australia" and is pist that they didn't add "Australia" to the list.

If you take it off you will be block. All the other list of game did not add Australia why should the Wii add Australia? just b/c Australia is not on the list doesnt give you the right to mess up the whole page. You need to stop and go back to what you were doing before you decided to come back and mess uup wiki.--Lbrun12415 04:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

N64, Atari, NES, SNES, PSX no one plays does anymore people care out games of this generation not the old.--Lbrun12415 05:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

IT doesn't matter every one likes it to be Japan, Europe, and North America nothing else many people find it a lot better that way b/c it indeed does have the more popular places and it indeed also has the fastest release dates. unlike other places which it does indeed take to long to get a release date.

Japan, Europe, and North America get games a lot faster then any were else.--Lbrun12415 05:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please see Mario Kart Wii europe got one day after way before anyone else.

I'll show you what I mean so that I wont feel stupid

List of Xbox 360 games no Australia

List of PlayStation 3 games no Australia

List of PlayStation Portable games the only one that has Australia

List of Nintendo DS games no Australia

List of Wii games The one you messed you and many people are pissed about

List of Nintendo 64 games no Australia

List of Atari 2600 games no Australia

List of Nintendo Entertainment System games no Australia

List of Super Nintendo Entertainment System games no Australia

List of PlayStation 1 games no Australia

List of Wii games

Simply re-deleting the information is the wrong way to go about this. That's why I proposed an article split to keep the size down and to preserve factual, relevant data. If you could please, explain to everyone why it is that the release dates are not allowed in the article because some of them are missing? Instead of saying "THARS NO AUSTRIA!!1" please come up with an unbiased and sensible point of view. Continuing to act like this will likely get you reported for admin intervention. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Make a note of this: You treat other editors with complete disrespect, you ignore etiquette and come down on others for falling even slightly out of line and you're participating in an edit war with multiple editors who disagree with your rash decision making. Summarizing your words in "childish banter" is right on the money, you need to grow up and learn to work with other people especially when making major changes. As I said before, you're asking for disciplinary measures from more respectable members of the community

Note: I by no means consider myself a respectable member of the community, take a look at my editing history and you'll find I've made the same mistakes in the past. The thing is I recognize those actions as the wrong thing to do, and make efforts to keep from repeating them. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I have a question: If Australian release dates are so important to you why are you not making an effort to include them? Removing all the other dates because your favorite is missing is a classic "If I can't win, nobody will" attitude. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 05:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Aww, do you need help? No, seriously, to help ease the tension I'm offering to help you reconstruct the Australian release dates. Just tell me where a few good resources are and I'll pass whatever I find to you along with the reference for them. Although I think first the article should be split, and discussion should veer towards that end. One in the morning? Then get the hell off your computer and go to bed. I only hope you're easier to deal with after some sleep. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:06, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

And don't use my talk page for article talk please. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 06:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Truce?

I have never met a person like you before. How does it make you feel that you want to get me blocked after I undid something you did and you are trolling about it. Yes what I said was wrong I undid not b/c I don't want to get blocked BUT, b/c it was wrong for me to say that. And I have said I was Sorry but it seems you want me to be sorry by getting the both of us blocked??--Lbrun12415 05:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

UMM maybe you should read what I told her like a few sec ago.--Lbrun12415 05:53, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

When someone puts false information such as something which is not a source I could do as I please.--Lbrun12415 00:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Chill.

As much as it seems like everyone is out to disagree with you, getting heated up and making backhand comments like this and losing your cool really isn't getting you anywhere. Your "friend" may not be so interested in having Australia among the regions listed, but by all means it does not mean it can't be done or not able to be resolved amicably. Going for a deletionist view of removing all other release dates because Australia or S.Africa does not get a fair shake isn't helping, so why not try keep a cool head, and request for a compromise, some middle ground? Chan Yin Keen | Talk 06:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

It has been suggested that this page be split into multiple pages. Doesnt say remove

{{Split-apart}}

Im done with you

Please don't comment me back b/c i am indeed done with you, you seem not to understnad what i'm trying to tell, I offered a truce but no, you denined it so good bye.--Lbrun12415 01:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

A note

Hi ALP, please don't worry about whether other user's delete warnings from their talk page. I saw it and I'm sure the other admin did as well. It's definitely not worth the trouble and it is against user talk page guidelines. Thanks, R. Baley (talk) 01:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Replied at this section on my talk page diff. R. Baley (talk) 02:04, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I am growing tired of fighting you, Link, just wait for 1 week until nomader finishes his version on his userspace. Besides, I left you a message on the discussion page that you didn't even bother to check out. Plus, I know we go off on the wrong foot, so here's a cookie.

I am a jedi (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Plesae stop reverting, of the people reading the article, you must think. May the Force be with you, Link, please consider this message of truce.

I'm sorry lets be friends

How about this we add Asia Pacific and take out the japan one since Asia Pacific covers japan, Australia, New Zealand....etc. please see http://www.nintendo.com/countryselector .--Lbrun12415 22:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of characters in the Animal Crossing series

I have nominated List of characters in the Animal Crossing series, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of characters in the Animal Crossing series. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment about your remark towards me

Just because the discussion wasn't harming anyone, doesn't mean it should remain. Guidelines don't need to be ignored just because people aren't "harmed". You didn't need to be uncivil towards me, just because I was trying to help. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding that discussion at WT:ANIME

Aren't you going to change the names of Dragon Ball characters? You were right about consensus, more are indeed in favour of the dub stuff. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Adult Swim anime

I have nominated Category:Adult Swim anime (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- ] (] · ]) 17:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Working on a little something

Here. I don't know if it'll be satisfactory when completed for a few of the folks, but focusing on the still-incomplete reception section at the moment before going to the rest of the article to make sure that's buffered enough.

Anyway feel free to chime in with any fixes if I screw something up or word something bad as I go, just a head's up and all.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I dont understand

I dont understand. If you're retired from Misplaced Pages, why are you still so active?Gears Of War 19:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I think we've all been wondering that. Ashnard _Talk 15:06, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. I recently (today) semi-protected your userpage so that IP editors cannot further vandalise it. That said, if you are going to continue to contribute here (and of course, you are completely welcome to do so), then I recommend getting rid of the "retired" message your-fine-self. Cheers, happy (apparently), editing! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 02:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Moving Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire to Pokémon Ruby, Sapphire, and Emerald

I have decide to place the discussion on your move of Pokémon Ruby, Sapphire, and Emerald back to Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire on Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire's talk page as opposed to here in order to get a community view. Please comment on it here. Artichoker 20:26, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Sonic Template...compromise.

OK, the warnings can go. Just drop with the insults. As I said before, you didn't handle the actions in a very civil manner. And threatening to ban someone is just plain wrong. CBFan (talk) 20:42, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Sonic 8-bit versions.

Yeah, there's a different set of zones, different artwork, etc. By contrast, the two versions of Sonic 1 mostly have the same zones, with just a few that are only found in one version. (The layout of the zones is different even then, though.) Ben Standeven (talk) 14:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WarioWareWario.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WarioWareWario.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Tien Shinhan or Tienshinhan?

I noticed that you started tagging the pages in order to move them, but I think you should consider that Tenshinhan's dub name seems debatable. Which is it? Please reply on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 07:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, utilise Tien Shinhan for now. It's what the article mentions, and the other isn't even there. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 16:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Krillin

Hello, you marked this redirect as a CSD. Can you elaborate on why so I can decide whether to delete it or not? ugen64 (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is because you want to move Kuririn to Krillin, you should follow the instructions at WP:RM, and same for Tien Shinhan and Master Roshi. These moves are controversial so it needs to be discussed, the instructions are here. Cenarium 18:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

If there is a general discussion with consensus to move the pages, please give a link. Cenarium 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Even Sesshomaru, a steadfast opposer to the idea, conceded to it. The only dispute that exists is Son Goku, which is not a part of this move. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, but when you just have a speedy deletion request with no further comment, it's difficult to know what's happening. I've deleted the pages, you may proceed with the moves. Cheers, Cenarium 19:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Link, shouldn't we also use dub names for the Saiyans, Earthlings, supernatural beings, and aliens? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:28, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Go ahead and get started if you want. I'll mostly be doing the necessary tweaks. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Dragon Ball character names

I haven't been doing much editing lately, so I don't recall how long this bit has been on the articles. What consensus are we using here, and what are we considering as info sources. I ask because the articles tend to currently state that the anime names are used in "most" english adaptations. Are we referring to sources beyond the anime and manga (like toys, games, and other such merchandise)? Onikage725 (talk) 01:44, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BrainTrainingDS.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrainTrainingDS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

FFIII

It's not fair to block a merger that has been discussed for a long time in the grounds that you created the article; where have you been that your out of the loop on it in the first place? And besides, what is your actual objection? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:32, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Your totally correct, but that isn't the problem; it is the notability problems of the original game, and the thought was we could get FFIII to GA/FA as one article if we combined both articles strengths, because the original game is having a lot of trouble maintaining GA status because it was Japan only. 06:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

RFA

Have you ever considered a RFA?Gears Of War 20:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Wavedashing

I hope that you don't mind me reverting your edit. At this time, I think it would be best to leave a note at the VG talk page to direct the discussion back to the SSBM talk page. Cheers. Ashnard _Talk 10:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Ad Hominem Comment

Your comment served little purpose other than to attack me directly. If I may have requested for an AfD out of error in judgment, then the users will do the appropriate thing and say to keep it. You do not have to make such personal attacks like the one you just made.

Please refrain from making such comments in the future. All of us are trying to improve Misplaced Pages out of good faith. MuZemike (talk) 15:58, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I got your message; no problem. It was actually after I submitted the AfD that I realized that the game was actually popular not on the NES, but the Genesis. So I kind of went half-cocked there. MuZemike (talk) 20:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RhythmTengokuGold.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RhythmTengokuGold.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Your untoward comment in Talk:Eggman Nega

I have replied to your comment at the above article talk page, in the section entitled "Merge." Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 16:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

WQA on you

Please be aware that it has been filed here by User:AeronPrometheus. You're encouraged to respond to the concerns raised there so hopefully this dispute can be resolved. Thanks! :) Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:Super Smash Bros. fighters

Hey, could you give me a link to the TfD debate for Template:Super Smash Bros. fighters? I looked but I couldn't find it. Thanks, Artichoker 01:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, makes sense; but next time you should provide some rationale in your edit summaries for the removal. Happy editing, Artichoker 01:49, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Regarding that, there's a discussion Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Video games#Smash Bros. characters shouldn't be linked together via template? here if you're interested. Not saying you're wrong about it or anything, just really not getting the point of it at all.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Past magazines

I guess its safe to assume you have Famitsu magazines? If you're willing, I need sales figures for any past F-Zero game. Regards, « ₣M₣ » 19:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

So emailing is not an option? I ask this because... do you plan on updating the sales info and is it possible for the referencing to be more specific? Check out {{Cite journal}} for whatever 'vital' information that you maybe missing. If I do plan on taking Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games‎ to a higher status... eventually... I may, at the very least, need page number(s) from you. « ₣M₣ » 19:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Kirby Super Star Ultra does deserve its own article

The game does in fact deserve its own article, mainly due to the fact of its new gameplay modes. --Drkirby (talk) 06:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• I agree with Drkirby!
  • Reasons why Kirby Super Star Ultra needs its own article:

<quote>

I believe that Kirby Super Star Ultra has enough new content to warrant its own new article, so I am starting this survey on behalf of myself and other who wish to discuss opinions on this and why or why not it should or shouldn't get its own article

Please clearly state your position for the separating of the articles *Support to give Kirby Super Star Ultra its own article, or *Oppose to keep it combined, then sign your comment.

Because polling is no substitute for talking about it, please explain your reasons.

• Support With the 2 new sub games added (Along with 3 new mini games) updated graphics, added functionality added to the old sub games, such as bottom screen support and two player multiplayer added to Gourmet Race, are ground enough to justify the game to get its own article. In not merely a straight port, and saying that there is not enough new content to have its own article is comparable to saying Kirby's Adventure and Kirby: Nightmare in dreamland doesn't deserve to be separate (It adds updated Graphics, 1 new mode, and 3 new mini games, less then Kirby Super Star Ultra adds), or FE3 should be merged with the FF1 article, since all it does is update the graphics and adds a new chapter to the story.

Also, the large amount of content is lost between merging and making its own article, as exampled below.

• Kirby Super Star Ultra's article before remergeing: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kirby_Super_Star_Ultra&oldid=229721124
• Kirby Super Star Ultra's section after the merge: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Kirby_Super_Star&oldid=229653176#Remake

--Drkirby (talk) 17:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• Support I support a separate article. Like the SNES article, they explain the story of each sub-game, so with new games added, we put the stories for the "Revenge Of The King" and "Meta Knight Ultra" in the article.GENERALZERO (talk) 18:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• Support I support the existence of the Kirby Super Star Ultra article 100%. Here's one reason why: Kirby: Nightmare in Dreamland has its own article. Why doesn't this game have it's own article then? It has more content than the original Super Star than Nightmare in Dreamland did with Adventure.--76.173.139.63 (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

<end quote>

--76.173.139.63 (talk) 22:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose. In a KSSU article, we couldn't discuss gameplay (save for new gameplay found in the new modes), the plots of the new modes, development, and reception. Basically, you'd be hurting the FA potential of KSS to make an article that won't be big enough to even make GA. And in response to NiD, NiD was a brand new game built from the ground up. You can discuss its gameplay because its gameplay isn't the same, it's a different engine. KSSU's an enhanced port - CTDS has new subplots, does that need an article? And why is there a poll on my talk page? - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

• & again. –xeno (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Call of Duty - World at War DS

Hello there. They're not actually the same game, I took my lead from the Call of Duty 4 article, of which the NDS version is split into a separate article (Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare_(handheld_game)) as it contains a completely different storyline, levels, etc. I assume this will also be the case with World at War. Thanks! Fin©™ 20:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

GH On Tour Decades

I don't think that any specific unreleased GH game is putting a block to the GH FTC from completing - it's just that all of the future games needed a PR (even for a stub like Decades) as well as the GH3 song list passing the FLC (which is still going). We still would need to later bring a Decades article to the FTC, so there's no reason to hide that fact now and only be prepared to demonstrate that it reached GA shortly (3 months) after its release to keep the FTC. --MASEM 03:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Burden of proof

To use AVGN as a source, you'll need to demonstrate conclusively that it is subject to editorial oversight. "Prove that it isn't!" is insufficient. Generally, the way to do this is to find a editorial statement somewhere associated with it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

And like I said, if there was a good reason to believe it didn't exist, I would look for it. GT has editorial oversight, so how is that not good enough to believe it applies to these series of videos? - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

That's not good enough. Where is GT's editorial statement? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Incidentally, I recommend that you not pursue this "You're always wrong!" "No, you're always wrong!" nonsense on David Fuchs's talk page. Nobody comes off well from it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:19, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Then I hope you make sure to tell him not to continue his trolling with comparing people to brick walls, using the term "retarded" idiotically, etc. - A Link to the Past (talk) 02:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I did. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Not sure if you noticed this..

Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Katamari Damacy —Giggy 03:56, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

MASH merges

You have proposed the deletion of a large number of medium-importance character is continuing episodes of the gtanchise. According to deletion policy, it would be better to do a merge to a suitable place, such as Characters of the MASH franchise. I do not immediately see any suitable page, so I leave it to you to start one, and then merge the material, including the appropriate parts of the content from the major articles, and leaving redirects from the existing articles. Deletion is a last resort--if a merge is impossible, there is still the method of a redirect. You of course do not have to follow my advice, but i suuggst it wouldl be better to do it this way than to fight every one of them at AfD, which wil be the alternative. In the meantime, I have deprodded them. 08:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

About Kirby Super Star Ultra

I don't want to sound like a nuisance, but KSSU features plenty of new content. And I still disagree with you.--76.173.139.63 (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

AVGN

A flash-in-the-pan internet 'celebrity' shouldn't have say in an international work of truth and knowledge. I'll accept his opinion in ~3 years if/when he is a household name.

Just because wikipedia is mostly edited and contributed to by the internet generation don't mistake that to mean that internet celebrities are considered sources of encyclopaedic knowledge. I implore you to revert your knee-jerk revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.23.79 (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

AVGN

Firstly my apologies for not signing my last post, by the time I realised a bot or some-such had already corrected my oversight.

Perhaps the phrasing in my last message was not the best. I don't mean to say that with popularity comes validation of opinion. The AVGN is a character. He is one man's interpretation of mass entertainment; if the actor (I don't know his name off hand) who plays the AVGN presented his opinions and ideas on the video game market in his own words and his own style do you think he could be the celebrity he is today? Certainly not. Characters like the AVGN play to a certain audience, the kind that consumes anything online as irrefutable fact.

My punctuation and grammar may be off tonight, hard day at work, sorry. 79.78.23.79 (talk) 20:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:GanondorfTP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GanondorfTP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the images on Ganon

Just so you know: my comment came out wrong. In the last sentence there was a typo. I meant to write in TP, not Brawl. Sorry for the confusion; I was actually agreeing with you this time. The Prince (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wario.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wario.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Yoshi

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Yoshi. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 10:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)