Revision as of 21:34, 26 June 2008 editGryffindor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users54,004 edits →Villa Medici at Cafaggiolo: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:35, 26 June 2008 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,383 edits →Observation: ya knowNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::Well, reverting people at their own talk indeed makes no sense. But please heed to my advise regarding being a little more wise who to talk with off-line. This may be the most important conclusion from this another day in the great encyclopedia. --] 21:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | :::Well, reverting people at their own talk indeed makes no sense. But please heed to my advise regarding being a little more wise who to talk with off-line. This may be the most important conclusion from this another day in the great encyclopedia. --] 21:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::This is the edit that seems to be unsettling so many . As I said above, just another day in the life of the encyclopedia, but at least we seem to be rid of Robert1/Sussexman/Lauder.....or are we? Who knows what are admins know! Whooo hooo hooo kind of spooky isn't it? ] (]) 21:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | ::::This is the edit that seems to be unsettling so many . As I said above, just another day in the life of the encyclopedia, but at least we seem to be rid of Robert1/Sussexman/Lauder.....or are we? Who knows what are admins know! Whooo hooo hooo kind of spooky isn't it? ] (]) 21:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::::I don't imagine ya care if ya're blocked, but please don't revert people on their page, Giacomo. Since you don't want people to do it to you, ya know? Please? ] | ] 21:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC). | |||
== Villa Medici at Cafaggiolo == | == Villa Medici at Cafaggiolo == |
Revision as of 21:35, 26 June 2008
WHAT?
You're retiring? Caught me off guard, too say the least. GoodDay (talk) 00:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- He's not retiring, at least I don't think. I think he's bringing a bit of humour into proceedings - "got away!" strikes me as he's making a light hearted comment. I may be wrong, but I suspect Giano is annoyed, but letting everyone know he's ok deep down. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Giano I commend you on your efforts today, You are not the only one who is aware of the situation that is going on see here. BigDunc 01:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you Dunc. I have made my very strong feelings known To me a sock arguing for the return of Sussexman is akin to deception. This deceit appears to have been known and fostered by admins. To say I am disgusted is an understatement. After all the work to calm The Troubles, that Rockpocket canbehave like this is deplorable. I was not in on any secret, I just made a vague and inspired guess. I want all the "Troubles socks" exposed and public, otherwise there really is no way forward. Giano (talk) 07:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Observation
Giano, Rockpocket requests that I do not post at his page. He did not have to ask since I already said all I have to say that is discretion blocking needs conferring, blocking an editor indefinitely on the whim should result in desysopping and admin's unhumble demeanor always make matters worse. But I just want to make an unrelated observation regarding the further exchanges you had with that fellow.
Now, there seems to be an argument as to who said what and when in your email exchanges with him. I think the problem here is that this email correspondence occurred in the first place. I recommend against talking off-record with people who might misrepresent you at some point. Talking onwiki has this beauty of an easy to check who said what and when and no BS flies. People who talk off-line with untrustworthy individuals open a possibility of this "you said in the email to me that..." stuff. Do you remember how Durova managed to dupe Alex into believing that her action against !! was prompted by an ugly email harassment campaign against female editors and when Alex ask for clemency over her because of that she retracted that stuff claiming that she never said that making Alex look like a fool? It is best to keep all correspondence with the individuals who might later misrepresent you onwiki. Just a suggestion. --Irpen 21:14, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not to worry some actions are more obvious than confused admins Perhaps that will be the end of the story. Rockpocket seems determined to have the last word, and is now reverting me on his page. I call that being a bad loser. I wonder what the wicked elf's view on that is, he does seem remarkably quiet to night, as do some of the more vocal others. Oh well another day over in the great encyclopedia. Giano (talk) 21:21, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ya shouldn't be reverting Rock's removal of your posting at his page. It may get ya blocked Giano. GoodDay (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- The word is "you" not "ya" and do you imagine I care? Giano (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- 'Ya' is my personal usage. PS- Hoping you reconsider; if ya don't? oh well. GoodDay (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, reverting people at their own talk indeed makes no sense. But please heed to my advise regarding being a little more wise who to talk with off-line. This may be the most important conclusion from this another day in the great encyclopedia. --Irpen 21:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- This is the edit that seems to be unsettling so many . As I said above, just another day in the life of the encyclopedia, but at least we seem to be rid of Robert1/Sussexman/Lauder.....or are we? Who knows what are admins know! Whooo hooo hooo kind of spooky isn't it? Giano (talk) 21:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well, reverting people at their own talk indeed makes no sense. But please heed to my advise regarding being a little more wise who to talk with off-line. This may be the most important conclusion from this another day in the great encyclopedia. --Irpen 21:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- I don't imagine ya care if ya're blocked, but please don't revert people on their page, Giacomo. Since you don't want people to do it to you, ya know? Please? Bishonen | talk 21:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC).
Villa Medici at Cafaggiolo
Hi there, I left a message for your question on the talk page. sincerely Gryffindor 21:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)