Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:30, 14 May 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

• Talk:Chiropractic It is my opinion that [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title
• Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) Should appripriate conversions be in MOSNUM examples
• Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change neutral statement
• Template talk:Infobox Automobile Determine which fields to include in the automobile infobox. See proposal for simplification and request to add fuel economy.
• Template talk:Logic what should be included in the Philosophy of logic section of the logic navigation template
• Talk:AIDS denialism The term 'denialist' is a derogatory term used by those opposed to AIDS Rethinking and reflects the blatant prejudice of the article in general. As can be seen from the above comments, those editing this article don't even feel AIDS dissidents have the right to a name and by no possible standard can be considered neutral or even rational in their editorial decisions. This article is a stain on Misplaced Pages's reputation for fair and balanced content. It should be renamed AIDS dissidents and edited to provide fair and 'neutral viewpoint' coverage of the topic.
• Talk:Environmental issues with the Three Gorges Dam Debate over whether this is a content fork and if it should be re-merged or can stand alone
• Talk:Interpretation (logic)/Archive 1 math v phil A mathematician believes that an interpretation in logic does not have to assign unique names to each object in the domain of discourse, also believes that it is objects that we assign, not truth values third party requested
• Talk:Dysgenics As per talk page discussions, is the Dysgenics article giving too much credence to a fringe area of science?
• Talk:Veterinary chiropractic Some users feel that the chiropractic manipulation of animals is a mainstream procedure, citing a number of journal articles and a press release stating that the subject "Is becoming more mainstream". Others feel that the this statement implies the opposite, that since the articles cited are all low quality and published in low impact journals this doesn't implied mainstream acceptance. Further to this, there appear to be absolutely no mention of the subject in a search of a major veterinary journal, Veterinary Research.
• Talk:New York Pathological Society Does the article, as written at present, conform with the general notability guideline or otherwise merit an exception?
• Talk:Science in Medieval Western Europe Is it appropriate to rename "Science in the Middle Ages" to explicitly specify Medieval Western Europe and turn the "Science in the Middle Ages" into a more generic article on science in the time period as a whole?

For more information, see User:RFC bot