Misplaced Pages

Talk:Human feces: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:08, 8 August 2005 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers219,765 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 11:23, 10 August 2005 edit undo68.97.208.123 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
:::: The examples you provide are purposefully ridiculous fallacies, whereas browsing Misplaced Pages via the Random Article link is a perfectly normal behaviour. You have a point, though; censorship of The Picture(tm) isn't done because people might accidentally come across it. There are other reasons, and the main Feces talk page is full of them. --] 10:48, 8 August 2005 (UTC) :::: The examples you provide are purposefully ridiculous fallacies, whereas browsing Misplaced Pages via the Random Article link is a perfectly normal behaviour. You have a point, though; censorship of The Picture(tm) isn't done because people might accidentally come across it. There are other reasons, and the main Feces talk page is full of them. --] 10:48, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
::::: Just a commant about logic: Randomly pulling books from shelves is what I see people do in non-academic libraries all the time, which basically macthes hitting the "random" button. ] ] 17:08, 8 August 2005 (UTC) ::::: Just a commant about logic: Randomly pulling books from shelves is what I see people do in non-academic libraries all the time, which basically macthes hitting the "random" button. ] ] 17:08, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

I think it is very clear to everyone that Samboy and Psyk0 are just trying to stir up trouble. Classic troll behavior. They tried it on the main article page, and now they are trying it here. I am preparing an RfC on their behavior. ] 11:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:23, 10 August 2005

I'd like to offer a pre-emptive Strong Keep for this page. Probably the simplest answer to the heated discussions on the Feces page; those who need to learn about human feces can do so, those who don't want to see it don't have to. Good job, mikka. --Psyk0 21:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)

It is not me who started it. mikka (t) 02:01, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
Ah, my mistake. That was the impression you gave over at the main article. Still, good job on moving the picture anyway. --Psyk0 22:04, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
I totally agree. Now that the feces debate is done with, any attempts to remove or shrink Image:Human feces.jpg over here ought to be resisted by all of us. It's time to concede that any reader browsing a Misplaced Pages article entitled "human feces" should not be shocked by what they see. But the image is still vandal-bait; it always was and it always will be. --Ardonik.talk() 04:46, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
All that is true, but I also feel the image needs to be below the fold, for people who hit "random page" and what not. Samboy 02:41, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
I agree. I also think we should go to the library and put post-it notes over any objectionable material we might find, for people who randomly pull books off the shelf. And whatnot. We should all carry pooper scoopers to deal with people who randomly take a shit. And whatnot. In construction, drywall should be replaced with foam rubber for people who randomly walk into walls. And whatnot. All power outlets should be GFCI for people who randomly stick paperclips in little holes. And whatnot. Pornography shops should have everything hidden out of sight for people who randomly walk into buildings. And whatnot. 68.97.208.123 09:32, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
The examples you provide are purposefully ridiculous fallacies, whereas browsing Misplaced Pages via the Random Article link is a perfectly normal behaviour. You have a point, though; censorship of The Picture(tm) isn't done because people might accidentally come across it. There are other reasons, and the main Feces talk page is full of them. --Psyk0 10:48, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
Just a commant about logic: Randomly pulling books from shelves is what I see people do in non-academic libraries all the time, which basically macthes hitting the "random" button. mikka (t) 17:08, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

I think it is very clear to everyone that Samboy and Psyk0 are just trying to stir up trouble. Classic troll behavior. They tried it on the main article page, and now they are trying it here. I am preparing an RfC on their behavior. 68.97.208.123 11:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Talk:Human feces: Difference between revisions Add topic