Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:11, 6 December 2007

why did you delete the page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/Saigon_%28rapper%29

hasnt released an album yet, why is he on there then? this rap, hip hop, we have mixtapes and my boy long boss has lots of mixtapes under his belt back in NY and adelaide.

it says under the music guideline, "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable. This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries "

there are multiple prints advertising this artist, please undelete my boy from wikipedia. he gives his heart and soul and people like you "with the delete button" just try to keep a dude on the come up down. plz

you need a scan of the newspaper copy?!!?!

List of scandals of the Roman Catholic Church

I think we should delete the bloody thing as a BLP train wreck and a hopelessly subjective list. Who says the Inquisition, or the disputation with Luther were scandalous? And if we include St. Bartholomew's Day massacre, why not every other time some RC devotees have gone on a rampage.--Doc 04:29, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

"loony fringe theory" (OPV AIDS) on Koprowski page

I can understand an arguement in favour of fringe - however I can find no evidence for loony. Do you have any? SmithBlue (talk) 04:44, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey Thanks

Just noticed your color change to my UAF userbox. I believe that is the official color of all the schools in the UA system- since UAS (my college) uses it as well. I will have to change the others to match, as well as move them into the college section... I never noticed before that I put them under high school! 'Nee way, rambling aside, it looks very nice, thanks so much. l'aqúatique 07:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Death of Kurt Cobain

And gutting half the article in the middle of an AFD is appropriate? The guidelines openly state that an article should not be blanked - one could readily argue that cutting out half of an article falls along the lines of "blanking". Your statement of "The only way I'll vote Keep for this article.." is grossly inappropriate considering you already voted to delete it.

Seriously - if your contribution to the article is to cut it in half, just wait for the article to be deleted. Then all of the content will be gone. -- ChrisB (talk) 04:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Fixing the undue weight problem by removing the endless, uncritical regurgitation of a single conspiracy theory is not now, and never has been, blanking. FCYTravis (talk) 04:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

As I've been working on other projects and have only seen the discussion on the Kurt Cobain talk page today, I'll ask that you give me and other editors time to fix the article. I agree that the suicide dispute matieral is inappropriate for an encyclopedic article, but aside from that the article is fine. If you may, please list some suggestions as to what to do with the material on the article's talk page. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, there's always been debates about the suicide dispute there, but as ChrisB has said this is the best solution talk page consensus has come up with. However, like you I've come to the conclusion that the material in the article is just not suitable period, regardless of concerns about balancing POV, and we need to do something to improve it. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how to do a Request for Comments? That might be the best solution to figure out what to concerning the treatment of the suicide disputes in the article. I'll be helpful to see what those not really familiar with Cobain think of it. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm revamping the page to rework the suicide dispute mess. Please take a look at my revisions and comment on the talk page. WesleyDodds 09:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Chris Ivery‎

Can you take a look as they are now using this as a reference. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

What's up with United Airlines?

How come there was so many airports in Florida that had United Airlines showing up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.228.16.161 (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Someone is doing some mass vandalism that I had to revert. FCYTravis (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

I have warned 68.20.6.235 on his countless United Airlines edits. Just wanted to let you know. Sox23 22:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Metis TransPacific Airlines. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 22:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revert. :) Acalamari 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections

Hi FCYTravis. I really appreciate your comments and find them very constructive. I just want you to read my addendum where i explained explicitly my position. I hope receiving a feedback from you. Thanks again. -- FayssalF - 17:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the time you dedicated to read that. Much appreciated Travis. -- FayssalF - 14:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

RfArb / Nigel McGuinness

Travis, I have taken the Nigel McGuinness matter to ArbCom, which can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Nigel_McGuinness. Reswobslc (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)