Revision as of 17:52, 24 October 2007 editGiano II (talk | contribs)22,233 edits →Prod← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 24 October 2007 edit undoLifebaka (talk | contribs)15,116 edits rm sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
==Prod== | ==Prod== | ||
I don't understand why you prod'ed ]. It is true that it only links to articles that don't exist today ... but currently articles link to it. There are two Robeson Houses and one Robeson Home. --] <sup>(])</sup> 17:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | I don't understand why you prod'ed ]. It is true that it only links to articles that don't exist today ... but currently articles link to it. There are two Robeson Houses and one Robeson Home. --] <sup>(])</sup> 17:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Deletion == | |||
I see my edit here is not to your liking . Please do not ever again tag a clearly unfinished page, with an "in use" template on it for deletion again especially if it is a page '''I''' am in the process of creating. ] 17:52, 24 October 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:03, 24 October 2007
This is the discussion page for User:lifebaka.
Please do not vandalize this page, for it is annoying and doesn't actually do anything.
Virtual Tour Engine
Hi Thanks a lot. I'm really new in adding content to wikipedia and I wasn't aware of this policy. Sorry for problem. I read the policy that you mentioned to me and delete some parts. hope that make the article verifiable. Please tell me if you think this needs more modifications. regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by H ghaderian (talk • contribs) 19:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Claes Johansson
...I have added a source :( I add a source to every Olympic medalist... Doma-w 17:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Load Pull
Thanks for creating the Source Pull redirect yesterday, I was in a real hurry so was going to finish doing that today and I find that it's already done. Excellent. JMiall₰ 12:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi there!
You seem to have added a cleanup tag to the Scientific Temper article. But there's hardly anything in there to clean up yet, is there? Amit@Talk 13:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Internet as a source of prior art
Hi, thanks for your interest in the article Internet as a source of prior art. I wonder.. what should be wikified in the article? --Edcolins 16:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your answer. I have just created the article so that it reads like an encyclopedic article, but I may have missed something here. I have provided references, a background section, and so on. I am willing to improve the article, but I am afraid to say that your tag and answer are just not helpul. I have removed the tag for now. Please be more specific. --Edcolins 16:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I have modified the introduction paragraph. Thanks. --Edcolins 17:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Sorry
about the disambiguation page... I didn't know that someone would mind... Eyra 16:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Aglish
Hello.... you should have sources for the Aglish page now.
Let me know if you need more.
Cheers Akilduff - 18:00 11 Oct 2007
Linux Editors
I agree that page should be deleted. I cant do the work on it right no that i wanted to do. I would rather come back later and do a better initial job rather than stub it out right now.
how do we get rid of it? i would happily delete it myself, assuming that as the creator I am allowed to do that.
jjk
Jjk 02:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Tagging
Please don't tag and run. It helps nobody, especially if you use a supremely vague tag in the first place.
Also, please think before moving to other titles for no reason. All the Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemetery articles say the full name for consistency and because there are many non-Commonwealth cemeteries with the same or similar names. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS has a new (red) iPod 15:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, from a glance at your contributions, you seem to be moving a lot of articles to "better" titles. So far, a large minority of them have been moved back. Please read Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions carefully before deciding to move articles; or you can ask others with more experience at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves to make the changes for you. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS has a new (red) iPod 16:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Leitrim SFC 2004
And what, may I ask, is the problem? I provided a reference for this if you looked closely enough. And I had already extended it by giving the full listing of results for the groups. And what in God's name do you mean by 'context'? The link to the Leitrim SFC page is there, it explains it (the SFC) in more detail, this is only relating to the year in question. Owenmoresider 02:57, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Whatever about the other point, which I felt could be learned via the link to the overall SFC page, what do you mean by 'wikilink'? If it's linking them to a page about the club, then I don't believe there are that many of them on the wiki, bar one I know. And I'm not from Leitrim either, so I wouldn't be as aware of the clubs' backrgounds in greater detail, to do it. Owenmoresider 19:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Your NPWatcher application
Dear Lifebaka,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Jmlk17 09:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Shahbandar
It's all drawn from Commins, and when you have a single-source article, it's a bit counterproductive to cite every line as referring to the exact same source (though I could do this in extremis). Given this, and that the source itself appears credible, I believe the article has sufficient references to meet WP:REF. Why, then, should the tag remain? Biruitorul 12:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fair enough. However: a) that tag tends to be applied to controversial matters; is there anything especially controversial in there that would require additional citation? b) The subject is relatively obscure in English-language sources (just a few dozen Google hits), so it's unlikely we'll turn up much any time soon, and the source used is quite reliable. Biruitorul 22:25, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. I'll tell you what - give me a week and I'll see what other references I could incorporate. The ones I have at hand appear rather peripheral and don't treat his life in full, but I'll check what I can use. Commins' entry on him isn't footnoted, and his bibliography is rather general, but he is a rather trustworthy source and seems like a big Syria expert, so I think what he writes is fairly reliable. Biruitorul 01:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
List of AMD K10 microprocessors
I was wondering why you added an advertisement tag to List of AMD K10 microprocessors. You said in your edit summary that "all external links appear to be from manufacturer's site", but they all go to VR-Zone's website, not AMD's website. This page is meant to be like List of AMD Athlon 64 microprocessors, but with K10 processors. (When I took the information from Phenom (processor), I only copied the VR-Zone links since they are the most current and accurate at this time). I have expanded the introduction paragraph and removed the cont ext tag. I will add some references tomorrow, but could you explain your reason for the advert tag? -- Imperator3733 06:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Catherine Pegge
Hi ... sorry it did look odd... can you re-look Victuallers 12:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Brotherhood of International Government and Order article
I fail to understand just why this article is scheduled for deletion.
The organization BIG O in 3 of the Matt Helm films had its name clearly spelled out and is just as immoral as T.H.R.U.S.H. or Spectre. Indeed, perhaps even more so given their attempt to make much of the American Southwest radioactive in the film The Silencers.
Doesn't Matt Helm's chief adversary deserve its own mention on here?
George Senda Martinez, Ca. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Falkie2007 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Prod
I don't understand why you prod'ed Paul Robeson House. It is true that it only links to articles that don't exist today ... but currently seven articles link to it. There are two Robeson Houses and one Robeson Home. --evrik 17:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)