| Revision as of 18:39, 13 September 2007 editBenjiboi (talk | contribs)50,496 edits →Wolf Hudson: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:06, 14 September 2007 edit undo209.244.42.65 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - I agree with ] that ] was explained and has not been met. The 'multiple orgasisms' nearly makes him notable, but the necklace of notability is still a few pearls short. ]<font color="green">]</font>] 13:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - I agree with ] that ] was explained and has not been met. The 'multiple orgasisms' nearly makes him notable, but the necklace of notability is still a few pearls short. ]<font color="green">]</font>] 13:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Comment''' The brand new editor technically was told about the requirement and even responded in the talk pages (I spent some time formatting the responses and adding sig tags to clear up who stated what. And very likely thought that simply responding to those brusk decrees from on high was enough. I messaged them on the editor's talk page but it's still quite likely they don't know what exactly to add and how to ref to fulfill the requirements although it seems likely the article's subject meets at least one of the ] requirements. ] 18:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | :*'''Comment''' The brand new editor technically was told about the requirement and even responded in the talk pages (I spent some time formatting the responses and adding sig tags to clear up who stated what. And very likely thought that simply responding to those brusk decrees from on high was enough. I messaged them on the editor's talk page but it's still quite likely they don't know what exactly to add and how to ref to fulfill the requirements although it seems likely the article's subject meets at least one of the ] requirements. ] 18:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' -- NO NOTABILITY whatsoever and I am so sick and tired of this sort of article popping up with no significance, no notability and blatantly for the purpose some guy who took his clothes off in front of a camera to brag to his friends or advertise illegal sex services -- DELETE IMMEDATELY! | |||
Revision as of 21:06, 14 September 2007
Wolf Hudson
AfDs for this article:Found while looking through the articles for speedy deletion. The reason was: does not meet WP:PORNBIO. —— Eagle101 00:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Possible merge with one of his films, such as Porn Pig Playhouse? No, just delete it. If none of his work is notable, neither is he. Qworty 01:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 03:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- I was the editor who added the speedy tag but the subject (who posted his own article) wanted to "holdon"; no worries there. I quoted the provisions of WP:PORNBIO to him, and he doesn't meet them. Accounting4Taste 03:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO. Keb25 05:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, fails both BIO and the proposed PORNBIO. I do find the movie titles hilarious though. Only one of his film credits is recognised by the IMDB, and even that is listed as still filming. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with Andrew Lenahan that WP:PORNBIO was explained and has not been met. The 'multiple orgasisms' nearly makes him notable, but the necklace of notability is still a few pearls short. Colonel Tom 13:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment The brand new editor technically was told about the requirement and even responded in the talk pages (I spent some time formatting the responses and adding sig tags to clear up who stated what. And very likely thought that simply responding to those brusk decrees from on high was enough. I messaged them on the editor's talk page but it's still quite likely they don't know what exactly to add and how to ref to fulfill the requirements although it seems likely the article's subject meets at least one of the WP:PORNBIO requirements. Benjiboi 18:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- NO NOTABILITY whatsoever and I am so sick and tired of this sort of article popping up with no significance, no notability and blatantly for the purpose some guy who took his clothes off in front of a camera to brag to his friends or advertise illegal sex services -- DELETE IMMEDATELY!