| Revision as of 22:37, 11 July 2007 editTruth-evenifithurts (talk | contribs)17 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:46, 2 August 2007 edit undoRadiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 edits cleanout old issuesNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items HERE at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items HERE at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
| *] This article has now been locked down and had all mention of the fact that Israeli media, academics, archeologists, historians and even school children regard Masada a myth. Importantly scholarly works by the dean of anthropology at Hebrew University have been deleted as has a recent study by Israeli archeologists and forensic experts that show the victims at the site weren't even Jewish. Can administrators please revert this article so it's balanced and points to the glaring fact that over a dozen reliable sources show that most experts don't agree that the modern-day tourist site of Masada has anything to do with even the disputed myth of ancient Masada. There is no ] involved in adding these facts. Please read the history of the article and talk page. thanks ] 22:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | *] This article has now been locked down and had all mention of the fact that Israeli media, academics, archeologists, historians and even school children regard Masada a myth. Importantly scholarly works by the dean of anthropology at Hebrew University have been deleted as has a recent study by Israeli archeologists and forensic experts that show the victims at the site weren't even Jewish. Can administrators please revert this article so it's balanced and points to the glaring fact that over a dozen reliable sources show that most experts don't agree that the modern-day tourist site of Masada has anything to do with even the disputed myth of ancient Masada. There is no ] involved in adding these facts. Please read the history of the article and talk page. thanks ] 22:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] One editor has been introducing ] weighting in the article by promoting his view that this musician was not Jewish. He is being sly about it by reverting others' edits and removing the legitimate affiliations of authorities that oppose his preferred viewpoint while leaving those of his own authorities. In addition, Gustav has been harassing me by deleting other edits I have made on the ]. Please rein in Gustav--he does not deserve the right to edit others' work if he cannot contain himself.--] 02:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] There is lack of consensus after extensive discussion at this article about whether certain information should be included or not and how it should be formatted. The situation is verging on an edit warring - help is needed to create consensus. The information in question is the links to manufacturers of software. Some editors believe these links are spam and, and some editors believe the links are acceptable primary sources. This is not a conflict of interest issue because none of the editors are involved in any of the companies being linked, and there are multiple links, not links to one particular company. We invite editors to come and take a look and help create consensus about whether or not the links should be included and how they should be formatted. 03:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: This dispute is about the appropriateness of {{tl|Spoiler}} tags in a References/Citations section. It pertains to a citations method that may be introduced to other articles. 20:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: The members of the Baseball Players Task Force (a part of ]) have been discussing a set of naming conventions for baseball player bios. I have posted the draft copy ]. Please feel free to discuss/propose changes at the talk page for the draft copy. Thanks, 04:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *]: I can potentially add a lot of new info on this topic, but need pointers on style, formatting, references, and external links. I invite more experienced editors to visit the article and lead by example; I'll adopt your methods for new content. Thanks much! 15:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 2 August 2007
Shortcut- ]
- Talk:Masada This article has now been locked down and had all mention of the fact that Israeli media, academics, archeologists, historians and even school children regard Masada a myth. Importantly scholarly works by the dean of anthropology at Hebrew University have been deleted as has a recent study by Israeli archeologists and forensic experts that show the victims at the site weren't even Jewish. Can administrators please revert this article so it's balanced and points to the glaring fact that over a dozen reliable sources show that most experts don't agree that the modern-day tourist site of Masada has anything to do with even the disputed myth of ancient Masada. There is no POV involved in adding these facts. Please read the history of the article and talk page. thanks Truth-evenifithurts 22:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)