Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:21, 7 June 2024 editAnother Believer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers638,523 edits OneClickArchived "Good article reassessment for Ben's Chili Bowl" to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive 69← Previous edit Revision as of 09:07, 19 January 2025 edit undoSer Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators6,330,542 edits →Uploading multiple images to HR listingsNext edit →
(48 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|WT:NRHP}} {{shortcut|WT:NRHP}}
⚫ {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Project|needs-infobox=no}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2009-09-28/WikiProject report|||day=28|month=September|year=2009}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2009-09-28/WikiProject report|||day=28|month=September|year=2009}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-10-17/WikiProject report|||day =17|month=October|year=2011}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-10-17/WikiProject report|||day =17|month=October|year=2011}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
⚫ {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|needs-infobox=no}}
}}
{{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age= 1 |units=month |index=/Archive index }} {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age= 1 |units=month |index=/Archive index }}
{{Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/to do talkbox}} {{Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/to do talkbox}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 69 |counter = 70
|algo = old(30d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive %(counter)d
Line 15: Line 17:
}} }}


⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Website of the current occupant that just so happens to be occupying a NRHP property ==
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The question is, should the website of the current tenant/business of NRHP buildings be included as EL or in infobox as the website? ] (]) 01:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

== ] ==

I have questions about this newly-added listing. As no documentation appears when I click the external link, and that's being used in lieu of a third-party source, it fails ] at present. ]/]/] 05:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
:From the list: {{indent|10}}{{main other|{{short description|none|2=noreplace}}}}''This ] list is complete through posted {{NRHP date for lists/dates|Alaska}}.''{{#tag:ref|National Park Service, ], , retrieved {{NRHP date for lists/dates{{!}}Alaska}}.}}
:In this case, it is in the . '']''] 18:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

== Requested move at ] ==
]
An editor has requested that ] be moved to ], which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in ].<!-- from Template:RM notice--> - ] (]) 11:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)



{{reflist-talk}}

== Greater Nassau County NY lists ==

Howdy, some rearranging has been done recently on different lists for Nassau County, NY. Two new sublists have been created: ], and ]. Can someone get these lists added into the Progress list, so the counts are back up to date? Thanks, ] (]) 16:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

:I'll take care of it. '']''] 16:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
:To me, it's a matter of notability. I don't think whatever fly-by-night business that happens to be occupying a property warrants inclusion in an article at all; however, if the business is a notable one, or if it's been an occupant long enough to have accumulated local/regional press, then it likely would be mentioned in the article's prose. At that point, depending on the degree of notability, it would then warrant an external link and possibly the link in the infobox. ] (]) 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran ] 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:I agree with DrOrinScrivello on when to include the link and, looking at articles I created, I've put them both places. But maybe the infobox makes more sense if it is the original organization (like the church website) and the EL section makes sense if it's not the original purpose but a long-term occupant (like ]). This is just a thought; I don't think either location is "wrong". ] (]) 01:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


==]==
⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
Looks like many NRHP properties in ] were affected, damaged or destroyed. Among them are ], ], ], ], ], ]. There may be more. Is there someone who can verify the status of these and other properties ] (]) 16:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] ] 01:23, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
:Aside from what's made the news about them, I suspect it will be a while before any editors can verify what's still standing on the ground, as all of Altadena is still under evacuation orders. (That and the situation there is bad enough that historic buildings are very far down on the list of priorities, but I suppose that goes without saying.) The news has covered some of those sites, though; I know the McNally House and Farnsworth Park were destroyed, and Christmas Tree Lane suffered damage. ] <sup>]•]</sup> 00:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::This image https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/2025_eri/index.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawHzauFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHS6n1yEHBoh5ZtTQR3OHOAKX0NW6YUxU-g3r5T13MXQzjlfyaTXGLMJceg_aem_upD61pEpNxwhhmkPeL02BQ#12.78/34.20133/-118.12233 shows that several properties appear OK, but you can't know for sure unless you see it from the ground: Woodbury-Story House, Case Study House No. 20, Villa Carlotta, Keyes Bunglow ] (]) 19:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC) .
:::Villa Carlotta, Case Study House 20, and Christmas Tree Lane survived . Keyes Bungalow, Valentine Cottage B, Woodbury-Story, and Pacific Electric Substation 8 are the remaining unknowns. ] (]) 20:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Update: Woodbury-Story House survived with only minor damage. ] is marked as destroyed, although I think that this is an error since it sure seems to be still standing . Other two still not surveyed. ] (]) 18:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::Keyes Bungalow is OK ] (]) 04:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::And nothing remains of Valentine cottage. That should be all of them ] (]) 22:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
: is an "in-progress list of notable places reported damaged or destroyed by the Palisades and Eaton fires". Also is compiling "historic places impacted by the Los Angeles County fires". ]&nbsp;] 20:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)


⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Individually listed non-contributing properties to historic districts? ==
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Generally, when a building is ''non''-contributing to a historic district, we wouldn't care about it for this wikiproject. But I just created the article for the ], which was individually listed in 2016 when it turned 50 years old. The mentioned that it was within the ] but was listed as a non-contributing property because, at the time, it was only 31 years old. I expected to see that text followed with something like "and we're requesting it be added at this time" but it didn't.


== Uploading multiple images to HR listings ==
The historic district does list 3717 Harney as non-contributing but doesn't say why. I looked for updates on the Gold Coast Historic District that reclassified the property, but didn't see any. (This wouldn't be an increase per se, since the building sits squarely within the original boundary.)


In the past I have been able to simultaneously upload multiple images to HR listings.
Clearly, this is an obscure question, but is this really an individually listed non-contributing property to a historic district? - ] (]) 15:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


When I recently tried to upload multiple images to the Star Cash Grocery Store and Residence listing in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Douglas County, Kansas it only allowed me to upload a single photo and it didn't copy over the title of the photo.
:A property may be historic for one reason, and the district in which it sits may be historic for a different reason. Imagine a 19th-century town center that has a 1930s Art Deco building in it (perhaps the only such building in the entire community). Both notable, but the building does not contribute to the district's character. In your case, if the district is ever updated, the building's status might be changed to contributing. '']''] 22:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks for the thoughtful reply! ] (]) 02:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


I did not finish the upload because I did not want to end up adding the rest of the photos manually or one by one.
⚫ == Good article reassessment for ] ==
⚫ ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] <sub> '']''</sub> 14:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)


Can anyone tell me whether something has changed? What do I need to do to again be able to upload multiple photos to one listing?
== Help needed for infobox template with automatic category ==
I'm probably missing something obvious, but I was having trouble with updating infoboxes of individually listed contributing properties. For instance, the ] is an individually listed contributing property to the ] so the DP&L article should be in ].


Thanks for any help you can provide. ] (]) 02:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
But, when I update ] with the historic district, the infobox ''automatically'' places the article in the less specific ]. I then manually added the more specific category.


:{{ping|SharonPapierdreams}} Are you running into the issue over on Commons? I've been running into it with several Flickr uploads; not sure if it's affecting personal image uploads as well. --<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT">]</span><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 09:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
How do I get the article to ''only'' be in the more specific category? - ] (]) 18:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


==Indiana Landmarks photographs from Indiana Memory==
:I don't see a way to automatically place the article in a more specific category, but you can prevent the automatic placement in Category:Historic district contributing properties in STATE by adding a 'nocat=yes' parameter to the NRHP infobox template. You still have to manually add the more specific category, but at least that saves you from having to remove the other. ] (]) 13:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The latest round of DPLA uploads over at Commons has included a significant batch of images of landmarks from Indiana Memory - my search indicates something like 6,000. I've created to house them over on Commons, which I'm currently populating. At first blush this looks like something that might be useful to members of this project, if anyone would like to begin the Herculean task of sorting through the material. --<span style="font-family:Old English Text MT">]</span><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 09:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
::Ideally the template would have a value in addition to "CP", like "IL", that would do this automatically. But this approach is easy enough to cut and paste.{{pb}}Thank you! ] (]) 15:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
:Looking closer, there is an nrhp_type "indcp" but it automatically places the article in the ''national'' ] instead of the state one. So the same workaround is required. Adding this info to the ]. - ] (]) 14:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:07, 19 January 2025

Shortcut
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 28 September 2009.
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 17 October 2011.
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

To-do:


Development
Images
Maintenance


Good article reassessment for National Register of Historic Places

National Register of Historic Places has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska#Chena Building?

I have questions about this newly-added listing. As no documentation appears when I click the external link, and that's being used in lieu of a third-party source, it fails WP:V at present. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

From the list:
          This National Park Service list is complete through NPS recent listings posted January 17, 2025.
In this case, it is in the December 13 list. Magic♪piano 18:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024

An editor has requested that Gem Theatre be moved to Gem Theatre (Detroit), which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)


References

  1. National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, "National Register of Historic Places: Weekly List Actions", retrieved January 17, 2025.

Greater Nassau County NY lists

Howdy, some rearranging has been done recently on different lists for Nassau County, NY. Two new sublists have been created: National Register of Historic Places listings in Long Beach, New York, and National Register of Historic Places listings in Glen Cove, New York. Can someone get these lists added into the Progress list, so the counts are back up to date? Thanks, 25or6to4 (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I'll take care of it. Magic♪piano 16:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Eaton Fire

Looks like many NRHP properties in Altadena, California were affected, damaged or destroyed. Among them are Christmas Tree Lane, Farnsworth Park, Woodbury-Story House, Andrew McNally House, Scripps Hall (California), Zane Grey Estate. There may be more. Is there someone who can verify the status of these and other properties Einbierbitte (talk) 16:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Aside from what's made the news about them, I suspect it will be a while before any editors can verify what's still standing on the ground, as all of Altadena is still under evacuation orders. (That and the situation there is bad enough that historic buildings are very far down on the list of priorities, but I suppose that goes without saying.) The news has covered some of those sites, though; I know the McNally House and Farnsworth Park were destroyed, and Christmas Tree Lane suffered damage. TheCatalyst31 00:32, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
This image https://storms.ngs.noaa.gov/storms/2025_eri/index.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawHzauFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHS6n1yEHBoh5ZtTQR3OHOAKX0NW6YUxU-g3r5T13MXQzjlfyaTXGLMJceg_aem_upD61pEpNxwhhmkPeL02BQ#12.78/34.20133/-118.12233 shows that several properties appear OK, but you can't know for sure unless you see it from the ground: Woodbury-Story House, Case Study House No. 20, Villa Carlotta, Keyes Bunglow Einbierbitte (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2025 (UTC) .
Villa Carlotta, Case Study House 20, and Christmas Tree Lane survived . Keyes Bungalow, Valentine Cottage B, Woodbury-Story, and Pacific Electric Substation 8 are the remaining unknowns. Teemu08 (talk) 20:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Update: Woodbury-Story House survived with only minor damage. Pacific Electric Railway Company Substation No. 8 is marked as destroyed, although I think that this is an error since it sure seems to be still standing . Other two still not surveyed. Teemu08 (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Keyes Bungalow is OK Einbierbitte (talk) 04:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
And nothing remains of Valentine cottage. That should be all of them Teemu08 (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Landmarks and local institutions damaged or destroyed in LA fires is an "in-progress list of notable places reported damaged or destroyed by the Palisades and Eaton fires". Also LA Conservancy is compiling "historic places impacted by the Los Angeles County fires". Schazjmd (talk) 20:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Sycamore Historic District

Sycamore Historic District has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Uploading multiple images to HR listings

In the past I have been able to simultaneously upload multiple images to HR listings.

When I recently tried to upload multiple images to the Star Cash Grocery Store and Residence listing in the National Register of Historic Places listings in Douglas County, Kansas it only allowed me to upload a single photo and it didn't copy over the title of the photo.

I did not finish the upload because I did not want to end up adding the rest of the photos manually or one by one.

Can anyone tell me whether something has changed? What do I need to do to again be able to upload multiple photos to one listing?

Thanks for any help you can provide. SharonPapierdreams (talk) 02:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@SharonPapierdreams: Are you running into the issue over on Commons? Looks like there's a snafu with multiple-image uploads over there right now. I've been running into it with several Flickr uploads; not sure if it's affecting personal image uploads as well. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 09:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Indiana Landmarks photographs from Indiana Memory

The latest round of DPLA uploads over at Commons has included a significant batch of images of landmarks from Indiana Memory - my search indicates something like 6,000. I've created a category to house them over on Commons, which I'm currently populating. At first blush this looks like something that might be useful to members of this project, if anyone would like to begin the Herculean task of sorting through the material. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoLo dicono a Signa. 09:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories:
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places: Difference between revisions Add topic