Misplaced Pages

Talk:Joe Birkett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:12, 10 August 2007 editTDC (talk | contribs)8,719 edits →Blanking of controversy section by []← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:48, 13 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,915,107 editsm →top: -dup blp paramsTag: AWB 
(21 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Illinois}} {{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=yes|listas=Birkett, Joe|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=yes}}

{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Low}}

{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Low}}
{{ChicagoWikiProject}}
}}

{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}}


==Blanking of controversy section by ]== ==Blanking of controversy section by ]==
Line 18: Line 17:


::: so one of the articles you cited mentioned Birkett, that’s a start, all be it a bad one. And where, exactly, do "any" of the articles call this a controversy, for one, and where in any of these article are Birkett's actions called controversial? ] 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) ::: so one of the articles you cited mentioned Birkett, that’s a start, all be it a bad one. And where, exactly, do "any" of the articles call this a controversy, for one, and where in any of these article are Birkett's actions called controversial? ] 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

::::Well, I guess if you consider county officials prosecuting people based on partisan political sentiment to be uncontroversial, then there is no controversy. — ] ] 22:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

See, that's the thing.. it aint what ''you'' think and it aint what ''I'' think, its what a RS thinks, otherwise its original research. And so far, you have yet to demonstrate either notability or who ''specificly'' criticizes Birkett for this. ] 23:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

You mean, except for the Naperville Sun editorial and the Chicago Tribune article. — ] ] 14:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

: The Sun editorial does not mention Birkett's name, the Tribune does not call it a controversy, and basing an entire section in an article off of information like this is a violation of ] and ]. Sorry, no can do. ] 14:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

::It is of no interest to me or anyone else what partisan Republican hacks will or will not do. — ] ] 16:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

::: What are you talking about? You still have yet to make any good case for the inclusion of this material. ] 16:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
== WikiProject class rating==
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. ] 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:48, 13 November 2024

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
WikiProject iconIllinois Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChicago Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blanking of controversy section by User:TDC

User:TDC blanked the controversy section with the summary: "one article in the Naperville Sun does not a controversy make". The Naperville Sun accused the DuPage States Attorney of prosecuting two people for political reasons. It is highly notable. As you know, lots more sources are available. — goethean ॐ 21:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

One suburban newspaper article makes something highly notable?
NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each.
There is no "controversy" here and after reading the article from the Naperville Sun, it does nto even mention Birkett (love that link from the People's World Weekly though!). Torturous Devastating Cudgel 21:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The Chicago Tribune article has a quotation from Birkett claiming that the prosecution is about highway safety. — goethean ॐ 22:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
so one of the articles you cited mentioned Birkett, that’s a start, all be it a bad one. And where, exactly, do "any" of the articles call this a controversy, for one, and where in any of these article are Birkett's actions called controversial? Torturous Devastating Cudgel 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Well, I guess if you consider county officials prosecuting people based on partisan political sentiment to be uncontroversial, then there is no controversy. — goethean ॐ 22:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

See, that's the thing.. it aint what you think and it aint what I think, its what a RS thinks, otherwise its original research. And so far, you have yet to demonstrate either notability or who specificly criticizes Birkett for this. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 23:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

You mean, except for the Naperville Sun editorial and the Chicago Tribune article. — goethean ॐ 14:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

The Sun editorial does not mention Birkett's name, the Tribune does not call it a controversy, and basing an entire section in an article off of information like this is a violation of WP:WEIGHT and WP:BLP. Sorry, no can do. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 14:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
It is of no interest to me or anyone else what partisan Republican hacks will or will not do. — goethean ॐ 16:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
What are you talking about? You still have yet to make any good case for the inclusion of this material. Torturous Devastating Cudgel 16:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Joe Birkett: Difference between revisions Add topic