| Revision as of 07:35, 28 April 2007 editSatyrBot (talk | contribs)Bots121,099 editsm SatyrBot auto-adding tag to talk page. See User:SatyrBot/Current project← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:48, 13 November 2024 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,915,107 editsm →top: -dup blp paramsTag: AWB |
| (28 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|blp=yes|listas=Birkett, Joe|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|auto=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Illinois|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Chicago|importance=Low}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Blanking of controversy section by ]== |
|
{{ChicagoWikiProject}} |
|
|
|
] the controversy section with the summary: "one article in the Naperville Sun does not a controversy make". The Naperville Sun accused the DuPage States Attorney of prosecuting two people for political reasons. It is highly notable. As you know, lots more sources are available. — ] ] 21:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
: One suburban newspaper article makes something highly notable? |
|
{{WPBiography|living=yes|class=|importance=}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::''NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, '''and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each'''.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
: There is no "controversy" here and after reading the article from the Naperville Sun, it does nto even mention Birkett (love that link from the People's World Weekly though!). ] 21:23, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::The Chicago Tribune article has a quotation from Birkett claiming that the prosecution is about highway safety. — ] ] 22:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::: so one of the articles you cited mentioned Birkett, that’s a start, all be it a bad one. And where, exactly, do "any" of the articles call this a controversy, for one, and where in any of these article are Birkett's actions called controversial? ] 22:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::Well, I guess if you consider county officials prosecuting people based on partisan political sentiment to be uncontroversial, then there is no controversy. — ] ] 22:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
See, that's the thing.. it aint what ''you'' think and it aint what ''I'' think, its what a RS thinks, otherwise its original research. And so far, you have yet to demonstrate either notability or who ''specificly'' criticizes Birkett for this. ] 23:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
You mean, except for the Naperville Sun editorial and the Chicago Tribune article. — ] ] 14:38, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: The Sun editorial does not mention Birkett's name, the Tribune does not call it a controversy, and basing an entire section in an article off of information like this is a violation of ] and ]. Sorry, no can do. ] 14:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::It is of no interest to me or anyone else what partisan Republican hacks will or will not do. — ] ] 16:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::: What are you talking about? You still have yet to make any good case for the inclusion of this material. ] 16:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
== WikiProject class rating== |
|
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. ] 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC) |
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
