| Revision as of 17:54, 4 June 2012 editXB70Valyrie (talk | contribs)1,166 edits →I could really use some OWS help on an article: misspelling← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:37, 4 October 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,951,180 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
| (38 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{skip to talk}} | {{skip to talk}} | ||
| ⚫ | {{Talk header}} | ||
| {{WikiProject banner shell| | |||
| {{WikiProject OWS|class=project|importance=mid}} | {{WikiProject OWS|class=project|importance=mid}} | ||
| }} | |||
| ⚫ | {{Talk header}} | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 1 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 2 | ||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(15d) | |algo = old(15d) | ||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject OWS/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject OWS/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot |
{{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age=15 |units=days |index=/Archive index }} | ||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | ||
| |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes | |target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== Merge proposal == | ||
| What should be included? We need to set out some project rules and guidelines. These need to adhere to all Misplaced Pages policies as well, but we should at least have a set way of aproaching certain aspects. Do we like the basic set up of the main article or do we want to use it as a guide as we build the project?--] (]) 22:40, 7 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::I will begin researching through the guidelines and start writing up basic guidelines and perhap style as well. If other members see something that absolutely stands out as "What the heck" or they just want to make some copy edits to the section, feel free to change anything I write and if there is any dispute I will discussit it here before I attempt any changes id at all. This seemed to work well on another project recently so lets try that slowly.--] (]) 21:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::: That works for me. ] (]) 23:13, 15 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Project banner and infobox are enabled == | |||
| I have created the needed pages and links for the new project banner and infobox. <s>Coming up I will create an alternative banner for unrated articles</s>.--] (]) 09:55, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I've added the project banner to articles listed under ]. I've also done assessments. Feel free to reassess where needed. Several of the C-class articles are fairly close to B-class and I may have misjudged some. ] ] ] 01:09, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you!--] (]) 07:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Name == | |||
| This project should be consistent as to whether it is called WikiProject Occupy vs. WikiProject OWS (I prefer the former, since I see Occupy Wall Street as a single event within the greater Occupy movement). I think this is a great idea for a WikiProject. Members will certainly have much work to do as there is a lot of inconsistency between Occupy-related articles, numerous merge discussions, other debates, etc. I hope this project can generate a quality set of articles for the betterment of Misplaced Pages. I will be watching this group closely! --<font color="navy">]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 23:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I would support using WikiProject Occupy as well. Virtually all of the individual groups use "Occupy" in their names, even though Occupy Wall Street was the original. ] ] ] 01:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey...don't look at me. It was just the proposal page and then the page was moved before discussion. Moving the page at this point however...would entail work due to the amount of links now set up and a redirect may cause some confusion and errors but is not impossible. I have done it before....I could do it here. We should let this be fully discussed to gain full consensus before we act.--] (]) 07:50, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::My preference and the original idea was to name the actual project WikiProject Occupy Wall Street. The project is not movement associated and is geared towards the subject itself. OWS is the starting point and the basis for the scope. Naming OWS is a pretty good compromise if you think about it.--] (]) 23:58, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Template:WikiProject OWS == | |||
| A ] was started from a consensus on the article talk page of ], which is an article within the scope of this WikiProject.--] (]) 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
| I don't think ] should place articles within the Occupy Wall Street category. This category should be reserved for Occupy-relatead Misplaced Pages articles, not project-related articles. --<font color="navy">]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 01:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :So, just use it on actual Misplaced Pages articles and not on project space talk pages? ] ] ] 03:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: Most projects add templates to talk pages of project pages. I am just not sure how to add project pages to ] rather than ]. Again, Misplaced Pages articles belong in the latter category; project pages belong in the project category. --<font color="navy">]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 15:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Correction. The Template does not place the articles into the Occupy Wall Street Category. That is being done manually for top importance articles within the scope of OWS as a subject, not just because it is within the scope of the project. Occupy-relatead Misplaced Pages articles do not all have the word "Occupy" in them.--] (]) 07:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| : What do you mean the template does not place pages into the Occupy Wall Street category? Just click on the Occupy Wall Street category at the bottom of this page, look under the "W" section and you will see many project pages there. Perhaps I am misunderstanding something. --<font color="navy">]</font> <sub>(<font color="cc6600">]</font>)</sub> 15:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| No, I think I was misunderstanding what you were referring to. Let me look at the template and the guidelines and other project templates to double check, but i take it your major issue is the project banner itself placing the talk page itself into the category and you feel that is not appropriate. If this is correct we can deal with that.--] (]) 23:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Looking into this and will see if this is being done properly, but I can say the the category in question, has talk pages that have been added that do not have the project banner. From guidelines, I am unclear that using the topic "Occupy Wall Street" in the Banner Project "Category" was innappropriate. <s>I am not sure if adding a project template to a talkpage and having that template categorize the talk page into that sorting, for assessment and other automated tasks etc., is wrong.</s>--] (]) 23:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Nope...I think I see what needs to be done. Correcting now.--] (]) 23:33, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Request for information on WP1.0 web tool == | |||
| :::Got it. The "MAIN CATEGORY" is "WikiProject OWS" for the banner to categorize the "talk page" to our category. Done! {{done}}--] (]) 23:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the ]! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the ] that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables. | |||
| Thanks. --] (]) 23:39, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at where you can leave your response. ] (]) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC) | |||
| ==I could really use some OWS help on an article== | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:JJMC89@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/ListOfProjects&oldid=923068486 --> | |||
| Hi guys. I'm an airline pilot. You may know that 700 of us marched at the OWS demonstrations on Sept 13th 2011. I'm trying to bring the corporate robber-Barron tactics that airline management uses against the working class to light in my new article ]. Well, wouldn't you know it, as soon as I published it, it has found immediate opposition. On my talk page there are even suggestions of nominating it for deletion. If the article is indeed written from a POV, then I'd like help making it sound more neutral. AS I'm sure you guys would agree, it's hard for someone who is losing their shirt in the process of ] to have as neutral a perspective as possible. I'll need your support both in editing the article and keeping it in existence. Thanks very much. --] (]) 17:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:37, 4 October 2024
| Skip to table of contents |
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject OWS and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 15 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Merge proposal
A merge proposal was started from a consensus on the article talk page of Alt-left, which is an article within the scope of this WikiProject.--Mark Miller (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)