Revision as of 09:25, 8 December 2005 editGrutter (talk | contribs)1,729 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:45, 1 October 2024 edit undoDimadick (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers807,945 editsNo edit summary |
(807 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
⚫ |
] |
|
|
|
{{oldpeerreview|archive=1}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|listas=Bible And Homosexuality|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Christianity|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Judaism|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Bible|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ancient Near East|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=low|ethics=yes|social=yes }} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject LGBT studies}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{controversial}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 100K |
|
|
|counter = 6 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
⚫ |
|archive = Talk:The Bible and homosexuality/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Center for American Progress interview with Gene Robinson == |
|
==Cleanup and references== |
|
|
I've archived the previous talk page having finished cleaning up the page, as I think that most of the previous discussions aren't releveant any more. Apologies if I moved something by mistake that still needs to be addressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought about adding it to the Sodom article but decided against it: |
|
I've added references to each of the sections and given arguments for different interpretations of each of the passages and so have removed the totallydisputed tag. When people add more information please provide a reference for it! This is a contentious subject and I think one of the main reasons the page got the totallydisputed tag placed on it was that references weren't given and people were adding their own ]. |
|
|
|
1) The similar view of the Anglican Communion is already covered. |
|
|
2) It is unclear whether Robinson argues for the homosexual rape thesis |
|
|
"This is not a story about two men who fall in love and pledge themselves to a monogamous, faithful, lifelong intentioned relationship. This is about homosexual rape. No one is arguing for homosexual rape—or any kind of rape—because it is an act of violence." |
|
|
or for the inhospitality thesis |
|
|
"Within the scriptures themselves, homosexual rape is not the right interpretation of Sodom and Gomorrah—yet those who argue against homosexuality keep using it." ] (]) 16:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Janet Edmonds == |
|
I've also removed a short section on 1 Peter which you can see , as it wasn't referenced and I couldn't find anyone using it in any of the arguments about homosexuality. --] 09:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found her work on this blog: T. |
|
|
She is: |
|
|
"The author, Janet Edmonds, is a longtime member of Bethesda United Methodist Church in Bethesda, Maryland. Currently, the official policy of the United Methodist Church does not allow self-avowed practicing homosexuals to be ordained ministers, nor does it allow United Methodist clergy to officiate at same-sex marriage ceremonies or to hold these ceremonies in United Methodist churches. In addition, The United Methodist Book of Discipline currently states that, “The practice of homosexuality is incompatible with Christian teaching.” Janet wrote this booklet in September 2016 to help people understand that the Bible doesn’t say that homosexuality is a sin and with the hope of someday changing these United Methodist rules. As Christians, we are asked to seek justice. It is the author’s hope that this booklet will help to bring justice for LGBTQ individuals who have been condemned far too long." |
|
|
It is cited once by . ] (]) 17:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC) |
I thought about adding it to the Sodom article but decided against it:
1) The similar view of the Anglican Communion is already covered.
2) It is unclear whether Robinson argues for the homosexual rape thesis
"This is not a story about two men who fall in love and pledge themselves to a monogamous, faithful, lifelong intentioned relationship. This is about homosexual rape. No one is arguing for homosexual rape—or any kind of rape—because it is an act of violence."
or for the inhospitality thesis
"Within the scriptures themselves, homosexual rape is not the right interpretation of Sodom and Gomorrah—yet those who argue against homosexuality keep using it." 2A02:1810:BC04:4B00:A57A:AF0B:2B41:B90F (talk) 16:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)