Revision as of 23:46, 17 April 2007 editHseldon10 (talk | contribs)4,833 edits →On your continous addition of opinions to the article []← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:33, 20 April 2007 edit undoMichaelas10 (talk | contribs)11,793 edits Warning.Next edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::You are vandalizing the site by adding opinions, unsourced material, possibly defamatory wording (against Fox, or against other living persons), and through personal attacks against other users in the talk page. It is not a joke. For the 7th time, ]. Please place your opinions somewhere else, and ] your information before adding it. ] 23:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ::You are vandalizing the site by adding opinions, unsourced material, possibly defamatory wording (against Fox, or against other living persons), and through personal attacks against other users in the talk page. It is not a joke. For the 7th time, ]. Please place your opinions somewhere else, and ] your information before adding it. ] 23:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Vicente Fox== | |||
{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Vicente Fox|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not ], but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{2|Thank you.}}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ]</font><sup>]</font></sup> 11:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:33, 20 April 2007
Fox Presidential Library
I disagree with the inclusion of the following sentence:
With the election of Felipe Calderon from Fox's own party the PAN, many believe presidential libraries are likely to become a new tradition in Mexico.
There is no reliable source that document the "many believe" statement. Who believes it? How many? Why would they believe it? Is Calderón so similar to Fox? Has Calderón done anything to prepare for his Library, due to start construction in six years? The above sentence is nothing but an opinion and, if we were generous, original "research". It has no place in the article. Hari Seldon 01:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, I admire President Fox and President Calderón. In fact, I participated counting votes when Fox was elected, and though I didn't sympathize with his party at the time, I was thrilled to see the happiness and joy of Mexicans at the news of his victory. I did voted for Calderón, and was outraged when Lopez Obrador disregarded the work of hundreds of thousands that assured Mexico of its democratic certainty. However, precisely because of this, we owe them our commitment to the highest standards. If we add information that does not conform to the highest standards, others may follow and pretty soon their articles would be unreadeable and filled with unverifiable information that may not be true. It is because of this that I ask you for a little more research on the library. Now, don't worry, the project is way to new and there is not much information out yet, but it will be a note-worthy section in the future. If there is not enough information now, there is nothing wrong with making it a one or two sentences section, so long as those sentences are verifiable and conform to the highest standards. I hope you understand. Hari Seldon 02:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
On your continous addition of opinions to the article Vicente Fox
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Vicente Fox, you will be blocked from editing.
- How am I vandalizing the site? Is is a joke.
- You are vandalizing the site by adding opinions, unsourced material, possibly defamatory wording (against Fox, or against other living persons), and through personal attacks against other users in the talk page. It is not a joke. For the 7th time, wikipedia is not a blog. Please place your opinions somewhere else, and verify your information before adding it. Hari Seldon 23:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Vicente Fox
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Vicente Fox. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Michaelas 11:33, 20 April 2007 (UTC)