| Revision as of 11:03, 24 March 2007 editChuq (talk | contribs)Administrators20,773 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:05, 25 March 2007 edit undo144.132.216.253 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| :Ok, lets stretch things and pretend that the fact that you are making the same edits, to the same articles, using the same mispellings, from a similar IP range, is a complete co-incidence. To save repeating myself, please take a look at the comments directed to these allegedly completely "unrelated" other users (linked from ] and take heed of the warnings listed. Even if you are different person, the actions being carried out are identical. So the warning still stands. | :Ok, lets stretch things and pretend that the fact that you are making the same edits, to the same articles, using the same mispellings, from a similar IP range, is a complete co-incidence. To save repeating myself, please take a look at the comments directed to these allegedly completely "unrelated" other users (linked from ] and take heed of the warnings listed. Even if you are different person, the actions being carried out are identical. So the warning still stands. | ||
| :Please allow this to serve as your first warning. -- ] 11:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | :Please allow this to serve as your first warning. -- ] 11:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::I have made edits to more than just the exact same articles. Those warnings have no relevance to me as they refer to sockpuppeting, something that I have not done at all. My ip range is not at all similar. The ips, which there is absolutely no evidence shown that are even connected are 60.225 and 147.10, nothing to do with my ip number. What about the actions of wikiharassment? You have left no warnings there and as far as I am concerned, none of my edits are wrong, so no I will not stop unless presented with contrary evidence and not personal abuse, outlandish accusations based on nothing more than a couple of repeated edits that actually improved the article. I have been banned twice on evidence not more than abusive accusations. ] 10:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:05, 25 March 2007
For those(Dibo and Tancred) who allege that I was a sockpuppet( a term I have only recently learnt what it meant), the following was left at the accusation page, "Declined No evidence of a community ban. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)", so please stop the personal attacks etc. 144.132.217.29 09:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, lets stretch things and pretend that the fact that you are making the same edits, to the same articles, using the same mispellings, from a similar IP range, is a complete co-incidence. To save repeating myself, please take a look at the comments directed to these allegedly completely "unrelated" other users (linked from Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Rugby_666 and take heed of the warnings listed. Even if you are different person, the actions being carried out are identical. So the warning still stands.
- Please allow this to serve as your first warning. -- Chuq 11:03, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- I have made edits to more than just the exact same articles. Those warnings have no relevance to me as they refer to sockpuppeting, something that I have not done at all. My ip range is not at all similar. The ips, which there is absolutely no evidence shown that are even connected are 60.225 and 147.10, nothing to do with my ip number. What about the actions of wikiharassment? You have left no warnings there and as far as I am concerned, none of my edits are wrong, so no I will not stop unless presented with contrary evidence and not personal abuse, outlandish accusations based on nothing more than a couple of repeated edits that actually improved the article. I have been banned twice on evidence not more than abusive accusations. 144.132.216.253 10:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)