Misplaced Pages

User talk:FNMF: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:33, 20 March 2007 editGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits Three-revert rule← Previous edit Revision as of 02:57, 20 March 2007 edit undoGuettarda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators63,420 edits Three-revert ruleNext edit →
Line 69: Line 69:


It is important that you familiarise yourself with the ]. Please read the linked article. Thanks. ] 02:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC) It is important that you familiarise yourself with the ]. Please read the linked article. Thanks. ] 02:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

:As I said, the issue of "potentially libelous information" was already addressed. The material is based on reliable sources. It's accurate and relevant. So that exception ''doesn't apply'' in this case. ] 02:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:57, 20 March 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!!!

Hello FNMF! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! ≈ jossi ≈ t@
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

It is important that you familiarise yourself with the three-revert rule. Please read the linked article. Thanks. Guettarda 02:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

As I said, the issue of "potentially libelous information" was already addressed. The material is based on reliable sources. It's accurate and relevant. So that exception doesn't apply in this case. Guettarda 02:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
User talk:FNMF: Difference between revisions Add topic