| Revision as of 16:27, 20 February 2007 editBo (talk | contribs)1,202 editsm Keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:24, 21 February 2007 edit undoCounter-revolutionary (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users7,784 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div> | :''This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''.'' </div> | ||
| *''Keep'' Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. ] 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | *''Keep'' Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. ] 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - It has been nominated for deletion by ]. Why? you might ask, because they disagree with this organisation! A clear breach of Point of View. Notable organisation, nominated out of spite.--] 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:24, 21 February 2007
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 18:16, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
Federal Commonwealth Society
Previously deleted per Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Federal Commonwealth Society/hist, but whether the previous VfD achieved consensus was debatable either way, and 3 inbound links from articles survive at this point, so I wasn't comfortable tagging it for speedy. By the way, the old talk page survived, and here's an orphaned image about the group's proposal. Procedural nomination/abstain for now. Samaritan 16:27, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
- ...then User:AndyL deleted/protected it. Samaritan 21:51, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
- Delete --Spinboy 01:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
- Keep Looks like a person with an agenda re-nominated this page, possibly incorrectly, as I can find only what appears to be an old discussion page on the AfD pages. Bo 16:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - It has been nominated for deletion by User:RepublicUK. Why? you might ask, because they disagree with this organisation! A clear breach of Point of View. Notable organisation, nominated out of spite.--Couter-revolutionary 09:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)