| Revision as of 22:27, 11 May 2014 editKt66 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,277 edits →Shugden sect← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:58, 22 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Removed invalid span tag and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | | <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;"> | ||
| Hi '''Heicth'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | Hi '''Heicth'''! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. <br />Be our guest at ]! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ] (]) | ||
| <div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small |
<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false"><span class="ui-button-text">]</span></div><small>This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, ] (]) 20:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)</small> | ||
| </div> | </div> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ]<!-- Template:Teahouse_HostBot_Invitation --> | ||
| ==Shugden article manipulations== | |||
| ==the "ban" problem== | |||
| I just saw how heavy the article ] has been manipulated again. We should fix this issue now with the help of the Admins. It is totally crazy what these editors did. I inserted two warning templates for the time being. ] (]) 11:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Please run a Sockpuppet Investigation == | |||
| ==DL article section== | |||
| ok, thank you, I added my opinion. I am strict for ] and the other WP rules. You can contact me also in the future in similar cases though I am rather absent than present in WP, I am willing to minor contributions. ] (]) 17:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
| Please run a sockpuppet investigation, or I will.] (]) 23:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Re: Your message == | |||
| ==Merge discussion for ]== | |||
| You asked ''"Is it proper for Truthsayer62 to insert a large amount of Shugden websites at Dorje Shugden Controversy?"'' | |||
| ] An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been '''proposed for a ]''' with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going ], and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. ] (]) 19:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC) <!-- Template:mergenote --> | |||
| Please see what I write in the talk page of the article. ] (]) 07:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic ]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| ==3 May 2014== | |||
| On 2 May 2014 You wrote: '']: "Some news outlets host interactive columns '''they call blogs''', and these may be acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professional journalists or are '''professionals in the field''' on which they write and the blog is subject to the news outlet's full editorial control."'''' | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Of course such sources are acceptable - but still not nearly as good as when the same person publishes a properly referenced article in a peer reviewed journal or book. The key is the "peer review" which means other experts have checked it too. | |||
| ] (]) | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| == == | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Heicth, I tried to balance and added some templates to ]. This article is an utter mess. Please keep an eye on it that the campaigners don’t remove the templates and some of the corrections I added. I lack time to engage. ] (]) 09:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692268845 --> | |||
| == Re: 14th Dali Lama == | |||
| Please see my recent reply to your comment on the ] of that article. You also may be interested in ]. ] (]) 12:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == May 2014 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki> p. 20, in Introduction to Contemporary Academic Buddhist Theology; Its emergence and rationale</nowiki>{{red|''')'''}}<nowiki></ref>}}</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (-1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 15:01, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Shugden sect== | |||
| Hi, maybe interesting for you especially what Dr. Hill adds at the end: | |||
| :The final point he makes is that the Dalai Lama is often accused by the pro-Shugden side as suppressing freedom of religion. “This accusation makes no sense,” states Dr Hill. “The Dalai Lama is not head of any state; he has no military or police at his command; he has no political jurisdiction over which he can exercise suppression.” “Some members of the Gelug sect left the authority of the Dalai Lama in order to follow what they see as a purer form of religion. These people may not be very popular in other parts of the Gelug sect, but their human rights have not been violated nor their freedoms suppressed; even if some people did want to suppress or silence the pro-Shugen side, they simply have no means of doing so,” Dr Hill concludes. | |||
| :http://theforeigner.no/pages/news/distance-from-dalai-lama-protests-among-differing-opinions/ | |||
| Also this statement might be useful: http://buddhistische-ordensgemeinschaft.de/dbo_statement-shugden-protests-Dalai-Lama.htm | |||
| I lack time to edit the related articles ] and ] –] (]) 21:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Kelsang ''minor monk''== | |||
| Hi there. Did I claim this, that he would be a''minor monk''. This is not my terminology. Kelsang Gyatso insinuates that he would be somewhat the inheritor of Trijang Rinpoche and most Western followers of him believe that they were very close. I question this closeness. As an ''ordinary monk'' (not a tulku or Rinpoche), Kelsang could meet and see Trijang Rinpoche as any other ''ordinary monk'' or scholar. Contrary to this the real close students were HH the Dalai Lama, Dagyab Rinpoche and other high lamas who received exclusively highest teachings privately and in very very small groups (2 persons etc). I challenged this image of Kelsang as an inheritor and extremely close student to Trijang Rinpoche based on my understanding and knowledge of Tibetan society, monastic life and what was told to me by a tulku who really was very close to Trijang Rinpoche … (I hope this helps. This opinion of course cannot be included in Misplaced Pages!) | |||
| As a new development, you might be interested in this interview and you might make use of it for the related articles: http://info-buddhism.com/Dorje_Shugden_Conflict_Dalai_Lama_protests_Thierry_Dodin.html Thank you for the recent Clean Up! ] (]) 22:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:58, 22 January 2022
Heicth, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Heicth! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
Shugden article manipulations
I just saw how heavy the article Dorje Shugden Controversy has been manipulated again. We should fix this issue now with the help of the Admins. It is totally crazy what these editors did. I inserted two warning templates for the time being. Kt66 (talk) 11:49, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Please run a Sockpuppet Investigation
Please run a sockpuppet investigation, or I will.VictoriaGrayson (talk) 23:57, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Dorje Shugden controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing, Dorje Shugden controversy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Chris Fynn (talk) 19:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Dorje Shugden Controversy. Thank you.
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)