| Revision as of 03:28, 15 November 2019 editBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,458,452 edits template fix← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 17 January 2022 edit undo1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers198,178 edits Modifying redirect categories using Capricorn ♑ |
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
{{numbered subpages|max=8}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell| |
|
{{Portal:Law/DYK layout |
|
|
|
{{R with history}} |
|
|that the foreman of the jury who acquitted ] of treason during the ''']''' in Britain fainted after reading the verdict? |
|
|
|
{{R to subpage}} |
|
|that ] ] and ] of the ] ''']''' was instrumental in establishing a UK-chapter of the ]? |
|
|
|
{{R from subpage}} |
|
|that the locations in which one can execute a will according to the ''']''' include ships and aircraft? |
|
|
|
{{R to portal namespace}} |
|
|that legend tells of how 15th-century ] Sir ''']''' committed an early form of ]? |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|that ] was found not guilty of violating the ] by a jury even after the judge, ''']''', summed up strongly in favour of the prosecution? |
|
|
|that ''']''', a ] from the ] period whose work was largely forgotten for much of the 19th and 20th centuries, was recently cited in a 2006 ] case? |
|
|
|that one of the tasks of the ''']''' is to prevent ] monopolies developing in England and Wales? |
|
|
|that ''']''' was prompted to become a ] by the death of his wife? |
|
|
|that the ''']''' is the first ever disability-specific legislation to be passed in the ]? |
|
|
|that in ''''']''''' the ] found that a ] was liable in ] and ] when ] were hit over the ] onto neighbouring property, and that it is best known for the lyrical dissenting judgment of ], ]? |
|
|
|that ] ] ''']''' was the first head of the ] after it was founded in 1986? |
|
|
|that in ], ''']''' are used for things as varied as land transfers, bribery and murder? |
|
|
|that the legal reforms that came about as a result of the ''']''' were far weaker than those initially proposed? |
|
|
|that ]'s regulations on ] sales, as originated from the ''']''' (]), were enforced for six centuries? |
|
|
|that in his first murder case, ] and ] specialist ''']''' saved suspected ] ] from being hanged? |
|
|
|that in the six months after the ''']''' was passed in ] in 1830, nearly 25,000 new licenses to open ], ]s and alehouses were issued? |
|
|
|that according to ], ''']''' "have little in common except the accident of sharing the same name"? |
|
|
|that after a meeting in 1940, the English ''']''' did not meet for another 10 years?}}<noinclude> |
|
|
== Source == |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Portal:Law/DYK layout |
|
|
|that the ''''']''''' (written c. 1115) sets out a list of royal pleas or pleas of the crown, crimes that could only be tried in front of the king or his officials? |
|
|
|that English ] ''']''' went to the ] every day from 1661 to 1710, but was never known to have a ] for a client? |
|
|
|that the English case of ''''']''''', at first accepted by the judiciary, has "been reduced to such an extent that the ruling has almost become meaningless"? |
|
|
|that according to one theory, ''']''' are entirely constructed by the courts? |
|
|
|that two sections of the British ''']''' were completely identical?}} |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
|
== Source == |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Portal:Law/DYK layout |
|
|
|that the case ''''']''''' established the ]s for ] ] law? |
|
|
|that although the ''']''' was repealed in the ], it is still valid in the ] and parts of ]? |
|
|
|that although the report of the ''']''' led to the ''']''', the report and Act disagreed in many ways? |
|
|
|that ''']''' was the first ] writer to write his works in English? |
|
|
|that in the United Kingdom, the ''']''' of ] carries a maximum penalty of ]?}} |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
|
== Source == |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Portal:Law/DYK layout |
|
|
|that detonating ] is specifically forbidden in ] under the ''']'''? |
|
|
|that ] in ] can bring in an ''']''' that confirms a death is suspicious without specifying how it came about? |
|
|
|that in English law, ''''']''''' may be ] trusts, ] trusts, express trusts, or completely illusory? |
|
|
|that ''']''' was only offered the position of ] after ] turned it down?}} |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
|
== Source == |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
</noinclude> |
|
|
|
|
|
---- |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Portal:Law/DYK layout |
|
|
|that part of the ''']''', a piece of ] legislation on ], is intended to permit educational and recreational use of land? |
|
|
|that the landmark 1924 case ''''']''''' clarified ] on the obligations that a bank has to protect the confidentiality of its customers? |
|
|
|that other than "incapable" beneficiaries, the ''']''' only allows the courts to alter trust documents for ''potential beneficiaries'', not confirmed ones? |
|
|
|that in ], legal aid, a court of criminal appeal, county courts and limits on the use of the death penalty were proposed as early as 1652 by the ''']'''? |
|
|
|that by the time ''']''' was dissolved it was being run by only two of the standard twelve governors, neither of whom had any idea what their duties were?}} |
|
|
<noinclude> |
|
|
== Source == |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
#] |
|
|
</noinclude> |
|