Misplaced Pages

31 January 2013

• curprev 21:5021:50, 31 January 2013 Devanampriya talk contribs 7,291 bytes −1,563 Undid revision 535852918 by 182.177.79.242 (talk) Please stop edit warring and discuss. The admin stipulated that status quo remains until mediation processes over. undo
• curprev 12:4912:49, 31 January 2013 182.177.79.242 talk 8,854 bytes +1,563 I think this is another sock of the same Indian POV-warrior who used User:Shahdaan Khan in September 2012; When all major Western sources write "Afghans defeated Sikhs in Jamrud", we present here similar result!!!! undo

26 January 2013

• curprev 23:0423:04, 26 January 2013 Devanampriya talk contribs 7,291 bytes −1,563 Undid revision 534806368 by 182.177.124.43 (talk) dispute is en route to being reviewed by Reliable Sources panel. Status quo per admin remains until then. Discuss concerns on talk page undo

25 January 2013

• curprev 11:1111:11, 25 January 2013 182.177.124.43 talk 8,854 bytes +1,563 rvv undo

16 January 2013

• curprev 23:0223:02, 16 January 2013 FrescoBot talk contribs m 7,291 bytes −2 Bot: link syntax/spacing undo

14 January 2013

• curprev 23:2223:22, 14 January 2013 Theman244 talk contribs 7,293 bytes −1,561 Reverted to revision 530454508 by DumbBOT: Last stale ver. how can someone change this without concensus, while matter is still under dispute resolution.. (TW) undo

13 January 2013

• curprev 13:2613:26, 13 January 2013 182.177.74.223 talk 8,854 bytes +7 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:2413:24, 13 January 2013 182.177.74.223 talk 8,847 bytes +1,640 this is Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view and a historical fact; the invading Sikhs from Punjab lost their top commander at this battle and you call that Sikh victory? That's like saying that al-Qaida won in 2011 when US forces killed Osama bin Laden undo

12 January 2013

• curprev 21:2621:26, 12 January 2013 24.5.195.190 talk 7,207 bytes −86 →The battle undo

30 December 2012

• curprev 14:1814:18, 30 December 2012 DumbBOT talk contribs 7,293 bytes −27 removing a protection template from a non-protected page (info) undo

23 December 2012

• curprev 04:1204:12, 23 December 2012 Nick-D talk contribs m 7,320 bytes 0 Changed protection level of Battle of Jamrud: Edit warring / Content dispute: Fully protecting for one week. Semi-protection is likely to then be needed as per James' action (‎ (expires 04:12, 30 December 2012 (UTC undo

21 December 2012

• curprev 02:1502:15, 21 December 2012 Devanampriya talk contribs 7,320 bytes −161 re: Please see talk page to discuss. By applying standard mil hist framework, this was a sikh victory. Afghan objective was jamrud fort--which they failed to take. undo

16 October 2012

• curprev 12:5612:56, 16 October 2012 JBW talk contribs 7,481 bytes +27 Protection tag undo
• curprev 12:5512:55, 16 October 2012 JBW talk contribs m 7,454 bytes 0 Protected Battle of Jamrud: Persistent edit warring, point-of-view pushing, and sockpuppetry. (‎ (expires 12:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC)) ‎ (expires 12:55, 16 April 2013 (UTC))) undo
• curprev 10:3510:35, 16 October 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs 7,454 bytes +439 Rescuing orphaned refs ("Adamec" from rev 518094517) undo
• curprev 10:2410:24, 16 October 2012 JBW talk contribs 7,015 bytes −584 Restoring version of lead from before edit war between POV-pushing editors. undo
• curprev 10:1310:13, 16 October 2012 JBW talk contribs 7,599 bytes −3 Reverting disruptive edit by persistently disruptive editor. undo

13 October 2012

• curprev 05:3705:37, 13 October 2012 Adamdaley talk contribs m 7,602 bytes +178 Minor improvements. undo

5 October 2012

• curprev 16:0916:09, 5 October 2012 Paramandyr talk contribs 7,424 bytes +936 added figures and references undo
• curprev 07:1407:14, 5 October 2012 68.147.231.71 talk 6,488 bytes −54 No legitimate sources for these figures. undo

23 September 2012

• curprev 10:2610:26, 23 September 2012 122.167.105.147 talk 6,542 bytes +3 No edit summary undo

13 September 2012

• curprev 04:5604:56, 13 September 2012 Paramandyr talk contribs 6,539 bytes +448 rv, restored references and referenced information, use talk page undo
• curprev 04:5404:54, 13 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,091 bytes −448 REVERTING FANATICAL CHANGES WITH FACTS.... undo

11 September 2012

• curprev 05:3305:33, 11 September 2012 Manchesterunited10 talk contribs m 6,539 bytes −103 just a short summary and better understanding for the reader. undo

9 September 2012

• curprev 23:3023:30, 9 September 2012 Paramandyr talk contribs 6,642 bytes +557 rv, I'm thinking this needs a discussion undo
• curprev 23:2723:27, 9 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,085 bytes −557 REVERTING VANDALISM..!!!!!!! undo

8 September 2012

• curprev 19:0519:05, 8 September 2012 Darkness Shines talk contribs 6,642 bytes +118 Reverted to revision 503746080 by Mar4d: Rv to pre sock version. (TW) undo
• curprev 15:5815:58, 8 September 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs 6,524 bytes +439 Rescuing orphaned refs ("Adamec" from rev 511372440) undo
• curprev 13:5813:58, 8 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,085 bytes −611 No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:1813:18, 8 September 2012 86.169.208.209 talk 6,696 bytes +581 Undid revision 511370623 by Shahdaan Khan (talk)reverted vandalism undo
• curprev 12:5812:58, 8 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,115 bytes −581 No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:2709:27, 8 September 2012 Shahzadapashtun talk contribs 6,696 bytes +582 No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:5803:58, 8 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,114 bytes −533 HISTORICALY CORRECT AND FACTUAL HAPPENINGS ADDED. undo
• curprev 03:4503:45, 8 September 2012 Spartans1001 talk contribs m 6,647 bytes −53 8,000+15,000 = 23,000. And 600+10,000 = 10,600 undo
• curprev 03:3103:31, 8 September 2012 Spartans1001 talk contribs m 6,700 bytes +4 Makes better sense. Is correct in the English grammar. undo
• curprev 01:1401:14, 8 September 2012 Shahzadapashtun talk contribs 6,696 bytes +5 No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:1001:10, 8 September 2012 Shahzadapashtun talk contribs 6,691 bytes +60 →Background undo
• curprev 00:5300:53, 8 September 2012 Shahzadapashtun talk contribs 6,631 bytes −10 No edit summary undo

6 September 2012

• curprev 07:4907:49, 6 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,641 bytes +132 Totally correct details undo

4 September 2012

• curprev 17:1217:12, 4 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs 6,509 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 09:1309:13, 4 September 2012 AnomieBOT talk contribs 6,509 bytes +439 Rescuing orphaned refs ("Adamec" from rev 510504451) undo
• curprev 07:0207:02, 4 September 2012 Shahdaan Khan talk contribs m 6,070 bytes −30 No edit summary undo
• curprev 06:5106:51, 4 September 2012 121.245.5.64 talk 6,100 bytes −542 HAD AFGHANS WON THE WAR, WHY DID THEY CANT CAPTURE THE FORT? WHY DID THEY CANT DESTROY THE FORT? WHY DID THEY CANT CAPTURE PESHAWAR FOR WHICH SEIGE WAS LAID?? undo

2 September 2012

• curprev 23:2723:27, 2 September 2012 Shahzadapashtun talk contribs 6,642 bytes +26 No edit summary undo

1 September 2012

• curprev 08:5908:59, 1 September 2012 14.98.204.132 talk 6,616 bytes +81 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:5708:57, 1 September 2012 14.98.204.132 talk 6,535 bytes 0 No edit summary undo
• curprev 08:3408:34, 1 September 2012 121.245.41.96 talk 6,535 bytes −107 No edit summary undo

23 July 2012

• curprev 10:2610:26, 23 July 2012 Mar4d talk contribs 6,642 bytes +80 Reverted to revision 503347767 by 182.177.104.162: Revert sock of ABDEVILLIERS0007. (TW) undo
• curprev 06:2406:24, 23 July 2012 122.161.191.101 talk 6,562 bytes −30 →See also: NPOV no connection with Sikh undo
• curprev 06:2306:23, 23 July 2012 122.161.191.101 talk 6,592 bytes +4 No edit summary undo