Misplaced Pages

Talk:Opus Dei: Revision history

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
View logs for this page (view filter log)
Filter revisionsshowhide
External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

17 October 2004

14 September 2004

30 July 2004

29 July 2004

28 July 2004

27 July 2004

21 July 2004

3 June 2004

8 March 2004

4 March 2004

5 January 2004

4 January 2004

24 December 2003

15 December 2003

8 December 2003

7 December 2003

1 December 2003

30 November 2003

8 November 2003

23 October 2003

13 March 2003

12 March 2003

10 March 2003

8 March 2003

  • curprev 21:5721:57, 8 March 2003 Nuon~enwiki talk contribs 605 bytes +214 As this article has been edited, it appears to move closer and closer to the position that Opus Dei is a blameless, harmless, organization. Can we re-emphasize some of the anti-Opus-Dei POV, please? undo

5 November 2002

  • curprev 10:0610:06, 5 November 2002 217.158.106.3 talk 391 bytes +188 Someone (presumably an Opus Dei supporter) has replaced the previous article text with an entirely pro-Opus Dei article. Concatenating old and new versions for NPOV editing. undo

7 October 2002

(newest | oldest) View ( | older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Talk:Opus Dei: Revision history Add topic